Philip D. O’Neill

2.6k citations
78 papers · 1.7k indexed · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Philip D. O’Neill

73 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Philip D. O’Neill
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Modeling and Simulation 818
  • Statistics and Probability 249
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 168
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 423
  • Infectious Diseases 259
Replace Damian Clancy with:
Damian Clancy United Kingdom
Pieter Trapman Sweden
Peter Neal United Kingdom
Thomas House United Kingdom
David Greenhalgh United Kingdom
Mark M. Tanaka Australia
Åke Svensson Sweden
Lorenzo Pellis United Kingdom
Kari Auranen Finland
Daozhou Gao China
Philip D. O’Neill relative to Damian Clancy United Kingdom Damian Clancy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.4×
Damian Clancy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. O’Neill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. O’Neill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. O’Neill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. O’Neill. The network helps show where Philip D. O’Neill may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip D. O’Neill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip D. O’Neill Line = papers co-authored together Philip D. O’Neill links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201639
2 201617
3 201338
4 20139
5 20122
6 20111
7 201058
8 201047
9 201049
10 20091
11 200817
12 20075
13 200722
14 20071
15 200317
16 200315
17 200136
18 19982
19 199153
20 197611

About Philip D. O’Neill

Philip D. O’Neill is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Statistics and Probability, Mathematical Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Biochemistry, having authored 78 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include COVID-19 epidemiological studies (46 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (26 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (14 papers), Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (12 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (9 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (8 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (6 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (818 citations), Statistics and Probability (249 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (168 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (423 citations) and Infectious Diseases (259 citations). Philip D. O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Thailand. Frequent co-authors include Gareth O. Roberts, Frank Ball, Tom Britton, Nikolaos Demiris, Theodore Kypraios, Damian Clancy, C. S. Nicol, Niels G. Becker, John A. Jacquez and Ben S. Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as Advances in Applied Probability, Journal of Applied Probability, Biostatistics, Mathematical Biosciences and Scandinavian Journal of Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026