Peter Neal

2.1k citations
55 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Neal

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Neal
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
  • Modeling and Simulation 416
  • Statistics and Probability 267
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 209
  • Mathematical Physics 114
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 94
Replace Philip D. O’Neill with:
Philip D. O’Neill United Kingdom
Tina Toni United Kingdom
Charles J. Mode United States
Edward L. Ionides United States
Glenn Marion United Kingdom
Natalja Strelkowa Germany
Ingemar Nåsell Sweden
Andreas Ipsen United Kingdom
Pieter Trapman Sweden
Mark M. Tanaka Australia
Peter Neal relative to Philip D. O’Neill United Kingdom Philip D. O’Neill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Philip D. O’Neill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Neal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Neal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Neal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Neal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Neal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Neal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Neal. The network helps show where Peter Neal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Peter Neal, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Neal Line = papers co-authored together Peter Neal links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20232
3 20231
4 201715
5 20169
6 20142
7 20127
8 200914
9 200811
10 20089
11 200896
12 200711
13
Optimal Scaling of Random Walk Metropolis algorithms with\nDiscontinuous target densities
200718
14 200630
15 20051
16 20052
17 200452
18 20034
19 200318
20 2002138

About Peter Neal

Peter Neal is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Mathematical Physics, Statistics and Probability, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 55 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (24 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (23 papers), COVID-19 epidemiological studies (19 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (19 papers), Complex Network Analysis Techniques (16 papers), Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods (13 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (10 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (416 citations), Statistics and Probability (267 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (209 citations), Mathematical Physics (114 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (94 citations). Peter Neal has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Gareth O. Roberts, Frank Ball, Frank Ball, Jérôme Hamelin, Jonathan Dushoff, Bart Haegeman, John Moriarty, Joshua S. Weitz, Theodore Kypraios and Chris Jewell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Probability, Advances in Applied Probability, Mathematical Biosciences, Statistics and Computing and Journal of Mathematical Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026