Philip D. Floyd
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Co-authors
- Jonathan V. SweedlerLingjun LiFerdinand S. VilimNikolai DembrowKlaudiusz R. WeissL.A. ColdrenStanislav S. RubakhinTimothy A. Ellis
- Topics
- Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (25 papers)Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (22 papers)Photonic and Optical Devices (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesJapanNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Philip D. Floyd
45 papers receiving 974 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 354
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 255
- Molecular Biology 249
- Spectroscopy 205
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 162
Countries citing papers authored by Philip D. Floyd
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip D. Floyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip D. Floyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip D. Floyd more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip D. Floyd
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip D. Floyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip D. Floyd. The network helps show where Philip D. Floyd may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip D. Floyd
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip D. Floyd. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip D. Floyd based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip D. Floyd. Philip D. Floyd is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 103 | |
| 11 | 64 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 48 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Philip D. Floyd
Philip D. Floyd is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Pharmaceutical Science and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 48 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices (25 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (22 papers) and Photonic and Optical Devices (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (354 citations), Aging (24 citations) and Spectroscopy (205 citations). Philip D. Floyd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan V. Sweedler, Lingjun Li, Ferdinand S. Vilim, Nikolai Dembrow, Klaudiusz R. Weiss, L.A. Coldren, Stanislav S. Rubakhin, Timothy A. Ellis, Peter J. Skrdla and Philip C. Dell’Orco. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.