Philip C. Prorok

17.0k citations
133 papers · 6.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 41
Topics
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (59 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (33 papers)Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (18 papers)

In The Last Decade

Philip C. Prorok

130 papers receiving 6.3k citations

Hit Papers

Breast-Cancer Tumor Size, Overdiagnosis, and Mammography ...20162026201920222016100200300400

Peers

Philip C. Prorok
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 3.2k
  • Oncology 3.1k
  • Surgery 834
  • Cancer Research 813
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 785
Replace Ashley E. Winkler with:
Ashley E. Winkler United States
Massimo Di Maïo Italy
Francesco Perrone Italy
Riccardo Capocaccia Italy
R. Swindell United Kingdom
Sarah J. Lord Australia
Massimo Gion Italy
Martin Krapcho United States
Boštjan Šeruga Canada
Arnoud J. Templeton Switzerland
Philip C. Prorok relative to Ashley E. Winkler United States Ashley E. Winkler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Ashley E. Winkler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Prorok

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Prorok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Prorok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Prorok more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Prorok

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Prorok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Prorok. The network helps show where Philip C. Prorok may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Prorok

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Prorok. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Prorok based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Prorok. Philip C. Prorok is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 0
4 34
5 36
6 73
7 6
8 12
9 101
10 59
11 6
12 21
13 5
14 71
15 10
16 25
17 6
18 8
19 3
20 361

About Philip C. Prorok

Philip C. Prorok is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Oncology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 133 papers that have together received 6.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (59 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (33 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (3.1k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (3.2k citations) and Reproductive Medicine (479 citations). Philip C. Prorok has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include John K. Gohagan, Paul F. Pinsky, Barnett S. Kramer, Richard B. Hayes, Barnett S. Kramer, Richard M. Fagerstrom, H. Gilbert Welch, A. James O’Malley, Timothy R. Church and Pamela M. Marcus. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and JAMA.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026