Emily DeVoto

626 citations
9 papers · 507 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Emily DeVoto

8 papers receiving 487 citations

Peers

Emily DeVoto
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 250
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 89
  • Cancer Research 118
  • Oncology 61
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 38
Replace Anna Lee‐Feldstein with:
Anna Lee‐Feldstein United States
Monika A. Izano United States
Katharine Berry United States
Mark S. DeFrancesco United States
Claudia A. Snijder Netherlands
S Guercilena Italy
H. A. Sande Norway
Xiping Xu United States
Christina Lombardi United States
Jody Ralph Canada
Emily DeVoto relative to Anna Lee‐Feldstein United States Anna Lee‐Feldstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Anna Lee‐Feldstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emily DeVoto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily DeVoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily DeVoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily DeVoto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily DeVoto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily DeVoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily DeVoto. The network helps show where Emily DeVoto may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emily DeVoto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emily DeVoto Line = papers co-authored together Emily DeVoto links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2007126
2
Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethene, polychlorinated biphenyls, and breast cancer among African-American and white women in North Carolina.
2000102
3
Environmental contaminants and body fat distribution.
199975
4 199865
5 201559
6 199753
7 199521
8 20074
9 19942

About Emily DeVoto

Emily DeVoto is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Cancer Research, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 507 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact (5 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (4 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (4 papers), Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (1 paper), Cancer Risks and Factors (1 paper), Aluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals (1 paper), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (1 paper) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (250 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (89 citations), Cancer Research (118 citations), Oncology (61 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (38 citations). Emily DeVoto has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Armenia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Beth Newman, W. Heeschen, L. Kohlmeier, Robert C. Millikan, Barry Portnoy, Victoria H. Coleman‐Cowger, Stanley Zinberg, Catherine Y. Spong, Jay Schulkin and Barbara A. Bettes. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Industrial Medicine, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care and Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact