Philip C. Müller
Impact in
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Hepatology top 5%
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Beat P. Müller‐Stich (33 shared papers)Felix Nickel (26 shared papers)Henrik Petrowsky (12 shared papers)Thilo Hackert (14 shared papers)Kaspar Z’graggen (10 shared papers)Christoph Kuemmerli (15 shared papers)Georgios Kaissis (1 shared paper)Daniel Rueckert (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Surgical Endoscopy (12 papers)Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery (12 papers)Annals of Surgery (6 papers)BJS Open (4 papers)British journal of surgery (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip C. Müller
83 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Health Informatics 34
- Hepatology 160
- Oncology 455
- Surgery 649
- Gastroenterology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Müller
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Müller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Müller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Müller more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Müller
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Müller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Müller. The network helps show where Philip C. Müller may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip C. Müller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 71 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 66 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 61 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 49 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 42 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 39 | |
| 11 | 2018 | 35 | |
| 12 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 22 | |
| 17 | 2009 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 16 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 14 |
About Philip C. Müller
Philip C. Müller is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Hepatology and Epidemiology, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (36 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (14 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (14 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (12 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (11 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (10 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (10 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (34 citations), Hepatology (160 citations), Oncology (455 citations), Surgery (649 citations) and Gastroenterology (63 citations). Philip C. Müller has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Beat P. Müller‐Stich, Felix Nickel, Henrik Petrowsky, Thilo Hackert, Kaspar Z’graggen, Christoph Kuemmerli, Georgios Kaissis, Daniel Rueckert, Christian A. Gutschow and Pascal Probst. Their work appears in journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, Annals of Surgery, BJS Open and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.