Hannes Kenngott
- Health Informatics top 5%
- Surgery top 2%
- Surgical Simulation and Training 22
- Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes 10
- Esophageal and GI Pathology 5
- Pharmacy top 2%
- Gastroenterology top 5%
- Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments 5
-
- Augmented Reality Applications 12
-
- Anatomy and Medical Technology 12
-
- Diet and metabolism studies 7
-
- Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization 7
- Co-authors
- Beat P. Müller‐StichFelix NickelLars FischerMarkus W. BüchlerMartin WagnerKarl‐Friedrich KowalewskiStefanie SpeidelGeorg R. Linke
- Cited by
- Health InformaticsSurgeryPharmacy
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Hannes Kenngott
58 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Health Informatics 41
- Surgery 1.3k
- Pharmacy 114
- Gastroenterology 113
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 294
Countries citing papers authored by Hannes Kenngott
This map shows the geographic impact of Hannes Kenngott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannes Kenngott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannes Kenngott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hannes Kenngott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannes Kenngott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannes Kenngott. The network helps show where Hannes Kenngott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hannes Kenngott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 10 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 13 | |
| 6 | PREDICTING THE DURATION OF SURGERIES TO IMPROVE PROCESS EFFICIENCY IN HOSPITALS | 2017 | 3 |
| 7 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 73 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 36 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 62 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 100 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 82 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 55 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 19 | 2010 | 19 | |
| 20 | 2008 | 44 |
About Hannes Kenngott
Hannes Kenngott is a scholar working on Surgery, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Gastroenterology, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surgical Simulation and Training (22 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (12 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (12 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (10 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (7 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (7 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (5 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (41 citations), Surgery (1.3k citations) and Pharmacy (114 citations). Hannes Kenngott has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Beat P. Müller‐Stich, Felix Nickel, Lars Fischer, Markus W. Büchler, Martin Wagner, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, Stefanie Speidel, Georg R. Linke, Adrian T. Billeter and Sebastian Bodenstedt. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Annals of Surgery and Medical Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.