Caelán Max Haney

963 total citations
32 papers, 505 citations indexed

About

Caelán Max Haney is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Caelán Max Haney has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 505 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Surgery, 15 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 10 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Caelán Max Haney's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (7 papers). Caelán Max Haney is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (8 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (7 papers) and Anatomy and Medical Technology (7 papers). Caelán Max Haney collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Caelán Max Haney's co-authors include Beat P. Müller‐Stich, Felix Nickel, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, Thilo Hackert, Pascal Probst, Oliver Strobel, Eva Kalkum, Mona Wanda Schmidt, Markus K. Diener and Philip C. Müller and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Annals of Surgery and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Caelán Max Haney

27 papers receiving 497 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Caelán Max Haney Germany 11 323 320 260 58 37 32 505
Alec Engledow United Kingdom 15 154 0.5× 297 0.9× 116 0.4× 27 0.5× 26 0.7× 31 520
Konstantinos Blouhos Greece 12 170 0.5× 335 1.0× 143 0.6× 11 0.2× 11 0.3× 48 435
Yukio Nakabayashi Japan 10 138 0.4× 157 0.5× 74 0.3× 18 0.3× 19 0.5× 46 262
Vincenzo Sorce Italy 14 112 0.3× 355 1.1× 169 0.7× 27 0.5× 3 0.1× 19 456
Armando Geraldo Franchini Melani Brazil 12 251 0.8× 304 0.9× 92 0.4× 72 1.2× 3 0.1× 27 406
Seung Yoon Yang South Korea 13 367 1.1× 316 1.0× 162 0.6× 14 0.2× 18 0.5× 56 518
Shuvro H. Roy-Choudhury United Kingdom 12 97 0.3× 315 1.0× 349 1.3× 16 0.3× 67 1.8× 28 544
Camillo Orsini Italy 8 464 1.4× 512 1.6× 144 0.6× 60 1.0× 15 0.4× 13 605
Shungo Endo Japan 16 459 1.4× 249 0.8× 327 1.3× 27 0.5× 22 0.6× 72 681
Woon Kyung Jeong South Korea 13 309 1.0× 309 1.0× 111 0.4× 31 0.5× 17 0.5× 56 490

Countries citing papers authored by Caelán Max Haney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Caelán Max Haney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Caelán Max Haney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Caelán Max Haney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Caelán Max Haney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Caelán Max Haney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Caelán Max Haney. The network helps show where Caelán Max Haney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Caelán Max Haney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Caelán Max Haney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Caelán Max Haney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Caelán Max Haney. Caelán Max Haney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Haney, Caelán Max, Alexander Studier‐Fischer, Niklas Westhoff, et al.. (2025). Indocyanine‐guided ureter resection for radical cystectomy – a systematic review and meta‐analysis. British Journal of Urology. 135(6). 908–917.
3.
Neuberger, Manuel, Marietta Kirchner, Caelán Max Haney, et al.. (2024). Quality‐of‐life outcomes of the ROBOtic‐assisted versus Conventional Open Partial nephrectomy (ROBOCOP) II trial. British Journal of Urology. 134(3). 434–441. 2 indexed citations
4.
Haney, Caelán Max, et al.. (2024). Machine learning enables automated screening for systematic reviews and meta-analysis in urology. World Journal of Urology. 42(1). 396–396. 1 indexed citations
6.
8.
Studier‐Fischer, Alexander, Samuel Knoedler, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, et al.. (2023). ICG-augmented hyperspectral imaging for visualization of intestinal perfusion compared to conventional ICG fluorescence imaging: an experimental study. International Journal of Surgery. 109(12). 3883–3895. 3 indexed citations
9.
Haney, Caelán Max, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, Mona Wanda Schmidt, et al.. (2023). Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic bowel anastomoses: randomized crossover in vivo experimental study. Surgical Endoscopy. 37(8). 5894–5901. 4 indexed citations
10.
Studier‐Fischer, Alexander, Samuel Knoedler, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, et al.. (2023). HeiPorSPECTRAL - the Heidelberg Porcine HyperSPECTRAL Imaging Dataset of 20 Physiological Organs. Scientific Data. 10(1). 414–414. 12 indexed citations
11.
Kowalewski, Karl‐Friedrich, Manuel Neuberger, Marietta Kirchner, et al.. (2023). Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Open Partial Nephrectomy: The ROBOCOP II Study. European Urology Oncology. 7(1). 91–97. 15 indexed citations
12.
Haney, Caelán Max, Karl‐Friedrich Kowalewski, Niklas Westhoff, et al.. (2023). Robot-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. European Urology Focus. 9(6). 930–937. 14 indexed citations
13.
Kowalewski, Karl‐Friedrich, Jost von Hardenberg, Caelán Max Haney, et al.. (2022). Robot-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy vs Endoscopic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials. Journal of Endourology. 36(8). 1018–1028. 20 indexed citations
14.
Kowalewski, Karl‐Friedrich, et al.. (2022). Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy—A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. European Urology Focus. 9(3). 480–490. 7 indexed citations
15.
Kowalewski, Karl‐Friedrich, Manuel Neuberger, Marietta Kirchner, et al.. (2021). ROBOCOP II (ROBOtic assisted versus conventional open partial nephrectomy) randomised, controlled feasibility trial: clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 11(11). e052087–e052087. 3 indexed citations
17.
Haney, Caelán Max, Alexander Studier‐Fischer, Pascal Probst, et al.. (2021). A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open liver resection. HPB. 23(10). 1467–1481. 40 indexed citations
18.
Nickel, Felix, Caelán Max Haney, Pascal Probst, et al.. (2020). Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. HPB. 22. S322–S322. 30 indexed citations
19.
Nickel, Felix, Caelán Max Haney, Beat P. Müller‐Stich, & Thilo Hackert. (2020). Not yet IDEAL?—evidence and learning curves of minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy. HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition. 9(6). 812–814. 2 indexed citations
20.
Haney, Caelán Max, Martín de Santibañes, Benedict Kinny‐Köster, et al.. (2020). Training and learning curves in minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: from simulation to mastery. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 101–110. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026