Philip Bradfield
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Genetics
- Insect Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Hazel SpeedJohn InnesElaine MurphyIan FluxPaul JansenR. J. HayBruce WarburtonDale Williams
- Topics
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers)Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (7 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Philip Bradfield
8 papers receiving 412 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Ecology 497
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 145
- Genetics 87
- Insect Science 71
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 55
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Bradfield
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Bradfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Bradfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Bradfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Bradfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Bradfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Bradfield. The network helps show where Philip Bradfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Bradfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Bradfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Bradfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Bradfield. Philip Bradfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Diphacinone bait for ground control of rats on mainland conservation land. | 9 |
| 3 | Making endangered species safe: the case of the kokako of North Island, New Zealand | 7 |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 201 | |
| 6 | 41 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | LARGE-SCALE POISONING OF SHIP RATS (RATTUS RATTUS) IN INDIGENOUS FORESTS OF THE NORTH ISLAND, NEW ZEALAND | 144 |
| 9 | Change in diet of stoats following poisoning of rats in a New Zealand forest | 74 |
About Philip Bradfield
Philip Bradfield is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Emergency Medicine, having authored 9 papers that have together received 539 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (8 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (497 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (145 citations) and Ecological Modeling (45 citations). Philip Bradfield has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hazel Speed, John Innes, Elaine Murphy, Ian Flux, Paul Jansen, R. J. Hay, Bruce Warburton, Dale Williams, B. Kay Clapperton and Craig Gillies. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, New Zealand Journal of Ecology and New Zealand Journal of Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.