Philip Bird
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Otorhinolaryngology top 2%
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Papers in
-
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media 15
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 14
- Co-authors
- Evan J. BeggD. MurrayThomas J. BałkanyMei ZhangAnnelle V. HodgesDavid LeeStacy ButtsJeremy Hornibrook
- Journals
- Otology & Neurotology (12 papers)Cochlear Implants International (3 papers)The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (3 papers)The Laryngoscope (2 papers)ANZ Journal of Surgery (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip Bird
36 papers receiving 771 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Sensory Systems 480
- Otorhinolaryngology 238
- Neurology 375
- Cognitive Neuroscience 320
- Speech and Hearing 71
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Bird
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Bird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Bird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Bird. The network helps show where Philip Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Bird, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 4 | The current state of ototoxicity monitoring in New Zealand. | 2014 | 12 |
| 5 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 109 | |
| 9 | An audit of referrals to the Southern Cochlear Implant Paediatric Programme. | 2010 | 0 |
| 10 | 2010 | 42 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2007 | 186 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 18 | 2005 | 16 | |
| 19 | 1999 | 91 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 51 |
About Philip Bird
Philip Bird is a scholar working on Otorhinolaryngology, Sensory Systems, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 814 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (15 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (15 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (14 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (14 papers), Meningioma and schwannoma management (5 papers), Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis (4 papers), Head and Neck Anomalies (3 papers) and Ear and Head Tumors (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (480 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (238 citations), Neurology (375 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (320 citations) and Speech and Hearing (71 citations). Philip Bird has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Evan J. Begg, D. Murray, Thomas J. Bałkany, Mei Zhang, Annelle V. Hodges, David Lee, Stacy Butts, Jeremy Hornibrook, Orlando Gómez-Marı́n and Fred F. Telischi. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Cochlear Implants International, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, The Laryngoscope and ANZ Journal of Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.