John F. Pearson

12.1k citations
126 papers · 2.8k indexed · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

John F. Pearson

120 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

John F. Pearson
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Developmental Neuroscience 120
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 415
  • Aging 33
  • Cancer Research 230
  • Neurology 228
Replace Feng He with:
Feng He United States
Ling Shen United States
Edna Maria Vissoci Reiche Brazil
Hiroshi Yamasaki Japan
Xu Wang China
Olle Söder Sweden
Sara De Biasi Italy
Jos van Pelt Belgium
Sulagna Dutta Malaysia
Thomas C. Register United States
John F. Pearson relative to Feng He United States Feng He's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Feng He · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Pearson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Pearson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Pearson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Pearson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Pearson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Pearson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Pearson. The network helps show where John F. Pearson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John F. Pearson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John F. Pearson Line = papers co-authored together John F. Pearson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20243
3 202326
4 20231
5 20234
6 20231
7 202211
8 202118
9 20216
10 202030
11 201934
12 201924
13 201813
14 20185
15 201233
16 2011164
17 201059
18 20098
19
Abstract 1812: The Chromosome 9p21.3 Coronary Artery Disease Risk Locus is Associated with Altered Cardiac Gene Expression in Individuals without Overt Cardiac Abnormality
20081
20 200383

About John F. Pearson

John F. Pearson is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Aging, Cancer Research, Leadership and Management and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (8 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (7 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (7 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (7 papers), Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (5 papers), Inflammatory Bowel Disease (5 papers), Vitamin D Research Studies (4 papers) and Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (120 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (415 citations), Aging (33 citations), Cancer Research (230 citations) and Neurology (228 citations). John F. Pearson has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frank Frizelle, Rachel Purcell, Jacqueline I. Keenan, Martin A. Kennedy, Alan Aitchison, Janet K. Spittlehouse, Margreet C.M. Vissers, Richard B. Gearry, Deborah Mason and Stephen T. Chambers. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports, Colorectal Disease, Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Nutrients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026