Philip Birch

54 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers

Philip Birch
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Gender Studies 58
  • Clinical Psychology 120
  • Sociology and Political Science 152
  • Geology 18
  • Architecture 5
Replace Chien Liu with:
Chien Liu United States
Samantha Lundrigan United Kingdom
Natalie Jennifer Jones Canada
Michael C. Braswell United States
Shirley A. Dobbin United States
Anqi Shen United Kingdom
Jennifer Murray United Kingdom
David Ormerod United Kingdom
Carrie L. Cook United States
Deena A. Isom United States
Philip Birch relative to Chien Liu United States Chien Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.3×
Chien Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Birch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Birch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Birch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Birch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Birch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Birch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Birch. The network helps show where Philip Birch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Philip Birch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Philip Birch Line = papers co-authored together Philip Birch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200131
2 201231
3 201529
4 201520
5 201619
6 202315
7
Tackling the demand for prostitution: a rapid evidence assessment of the published research literature
200914
8 202013
9 201711
10 200210
11
Why Men Buy Sex: Examining sex worker clients
20158
12 20218
13 20177
14 20187
15 20136
16 20166
17 20155
18 20215
19 20245
20 20014

About Philip Birch

Philip Birch is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Health, Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 65 papers that have together received 319 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (13 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (10 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (8 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (8 papers), Sex work and related issues (7 papers), Stalking, Cyberstalking, and Harassment (6 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (6 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (58 citations), Clinical Psychology (120 citations), Sociology and Political Science (152 citations), Geology (18 citations) and Architecture (5 citations). Philip Birch has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jane L. Ireland, Michael H. Kennedy, Jason Prior, Phil Hubbard, Margaret H. Vickers, Johann Kolstee, A. M. Day, David Arnold, Eileen Baldry and Kris Christmann. Their work appears in journals such as Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice, Aggression and Violent Behavior, Sexuality & Culture, Journal of Criminal Psychology and Anthrozoös.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact