Philip B. Kruger
- Epidemiology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Ophthalmology top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Media Technology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven MathewsJordan PolaKaran R. AggarwalaFrances J RuckerClifton M. SchorLeon N. McLinLawrence StarkKenneth J. Ciuffreda
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers)Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (25 papers)Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers)
- Journals
- Vision ResearchInvestigative Ophthalmology & Visual ScienceJournal of the Optical Society of America A
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Philip B. Kruger
44 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Epidemiology 899
- Cognitive Neuroscience 851
- Ophthalmology 423
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 359
- Media Technology 111
Countries citing papers authored by Philip B. Kruger
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip B. Kruger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip B. Kruger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip B. Kruger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip B. Kruger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip B. Kruger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip B. Kruger. The network helps show where Philip B. Kruger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip B. Kruger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip B. Kruger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip B. Kruger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip B. Kruger. Philip B. Kruger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | Does dynamic accommodation respond to the shape of the blurred retinal image without changes in physical vergence | 1 |
| 3 | Effect of phenylephrine on static and dynamic accommodation | 2 |
| 4 | Retinal blood vessels may be used to detect the sign of defocus | 3 |
| 5 | 13 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 51 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 56 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Philip B. Kruger
Philip B. Kruger is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Ophthalmology and Epidemiology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (29 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (25 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (423 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (851 citations) and Epidemiology (899 citations). Philip B. Kruger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Steven Mathews, Jordan Pola, Karan R. Aggarwala, Frances J Rucker, Clifton M. Schor, Leon N. McLin, Lawrence Stark, Kenneth J. Ciuffreda, Norberto López‐Gil and Antonio J. Del Águila‐Carrasco. Their work appears in journals such as Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Journal of the Optical Society of America A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.