Petra Tenbült

607 total citations
8 papers, 443 citations indexed

About

Petra Tenbült is a scholar working on Plant Science, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Petra Tenbült has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 443 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Petra Tenbült's work include Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers). Petra Tenbült is often cited by papers focused on Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (4 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers). Petra Tenbült collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands and Taiwan. Petra Tenbült's co-authors include Carolien Martijn, Ellen Dreezens, Nanné K. de Vries, Gerjo Kok, Harald Merckelbach, Gerjo Kok and Gerard van Breukelen and has published in prestigious journals such as Appetite, British Food Journal and Social Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Petra Tenbült

8 papers receiving 408 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Petra Tenbült Netherlands	7	180	125	112	90	85	8	443
Ellen Dreezens Netherlands	7	180 1.0×	125 1.0×	112 1.0×	90 1.0×	85 1.0×	8	443
Amy Swerdlin United States	4	106 0.6×	89 0.7×	71 0.6×	68 0.8×	29 0.3×	5	477
Benjamin T. Wellens United Kingdom	5	62 0.3×	75 0.6×	44 0.4×	57 0.6×	53 0.6×	6	384
Andreas Haga Sweden	8	128 0.7×	215 1.7×	55 0.5×	60 0.7×	45 0.5×	10	552
Linda Langeborg Sweden	7	99 0.6×	188 1.5×	73 0.7×	31 0.3×	43 0.5×	10	458
Natascha Loebnitz Denmark	11	179 1.0×	378 3.0×	98 0.9×	70 0.8×	33 0.4×	19	610
Michał Folwarczny Norway	14	37 0.2×	216 1.7×	100 0.9×	113 1.3×	60 0.7×	38	473
Sabrina Stöckli Switzerland	11	72 0.4×	170 1.4×	115 1.0×	97 1.1×	66 0.8×	25	727
Anneleen Van Kerckhove Belgium	14	103 0.6×	375 3.0×	106 0.9×	126 1.4×	129 1.5×	42	784
Rhys Stevens Canada	10	112 0.6×	140 1.1×	121 1.1×	49 0.5×	40 0.5×	30	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Petra Tenbült

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Petra Tenbült's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petra Tenbült with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petra Tenbült more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Petra Tenbült

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petra Tenbült. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petra Tenbült. The network helps show where Petra Tenbült may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Petra Tenbült

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Petra Tenbült. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Petra Tenbült based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Petra Tenbült. Petra Tenbült is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Tenbült, Petra, Nanné K. de Vries, Gerard van Breukelen, Ellen Dreezens, & Carolien Martijn. (2008). Acceptance of genetically modified foods: The relation between technology and evaluation. Appetite. 51(1). 129–136. 12 indexed citations

2.

Tenbült, Petra, Nanné K. de Vries, Ellen Dreezens, & Carolien Martijn. (2008). Intuitive and explicit reactions towards “new” food technologies. British Food Journal. 110(6). 622–635. 12 indexed citations

3.

Dreezens, Ellen, Carolien Martijn, Petra Tenbült, Gerjo Kok, & Nanné K. de Vries. (2008). The Missing Link: On Strengthening the Relationship Between Values and Attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 30(2). 142–152. 6 indexed citations

4.

Tenbült, Petra, Nanné K. de Vries, Ellen Dreezens, & Carolien Martijn. (2007). Categorizing genetically modified food products. British Food Journal. 109(4). 305–314. 6 indexed citations

5.

Dreezens, Ellen, Carolien Martijn, Petra Tenbült, Gerjo Kok, & Nanné K. de Vries. (2005). Food and the relation between values and attitude characteristics. Appetite. 45(1). 40–46. 30 indexed citations

6.

Tenbült, Petra, Nanné K. de Vries, Ellen Dreezens, & Carolien Martijn. (2005). Perceived naturalness and acceptance of genetically modified food. Appetite. 45(1). 47–50. 108 indexed citations

7.

Dreezens, Ellen, Carolien Martijn, Petra Tenbült, Gerjo Kok, & Nanné K. de Vries. (2004). Food and values: an examination of values underlying attitudes toward genetically modified- and organically grown food products. Appetite. 44(1). 115–122. 172 indexed citations

8.

Martijn, Carolien, Petra Tenbült, Harald Merckelbach, Ellen Dreezens, & Nanné K. de Vries. (2002). Getting A Grip on Ourselves: Challenging Expectancies About Loss of Energy After Self-Control. Social Cognition. 20(6). 441–460. 97 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact