Petra M.J. Pollux
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Small Animals top 5%
- Co-authors
- Hannah F. WrightDaniel S. MillsKun GuoColin RobertsonSophie HallArie J. WesterJohn M. HudsonEdward H.F. de Haan
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers)Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeuroscienceNeuropsychologia
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Petra M.J. Pollux
22 papers receiving 437 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 186
- Genetics 181
- Social Psychology 102
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 93
- Small Animals 86
Countries citing papers authored by Petra M.J. Pollux
This map shows the geographic impact of Petra M.J. Pollux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Petra M.J. Pollux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Petra M.J. Pollux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Petra M.J. Pollux
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Petra M.J. Pollux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Petra M.J. Pollux. The network helps show where Petra M.J. Pollux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Petra M.J. Pollux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Petra M.J. Pollux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Petra M.J. Pollux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Petra M.J. Pollux. Petra M.J. Pollux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | Development and validation of a psychometric tool for assessing impulsivity in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) | 43 |
| 12 | 85 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Petra M.J. Pollux
Petra M.J. Pollux is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (8 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (86 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (186 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (93 citations). Petra M.J. Pollux has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Hannah F. Wright, Daniel S. Mills, Kun Guo, Colin Robertson, Sophie Hall, Arie J. Wester, John M. Hudson, Edward H.F. de Haan, Matt Craddock and Helen Partridge. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neuroscience and Neuropsychologia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.