Peter Wolff

1.8k citations
11 papers · 51 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Wolff

9 papers receiving 37 citations

Peers

Peter Wolff
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 13
  • Education 24
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 10
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 7
  • Development 2
Replace Ron Jones with:
Ron Jones United States
D. Kestenbaum United States
Phillip A. Reed United States
K. E. Varvell Belgium
Joss Ives Canada
K. Juhász Hungary
Bruno L. Lago Brazil
Zdeňka Koupilová Czechia
H. Caines United States
F. R. Watson United Kingdom
Peter Wolff relative to Ron Jones United States Ron Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Ron Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Wolff

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Wolff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Wolff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Wolff more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Wolff

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Wolff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Wolff. The network helps show where Peter Wolff may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Peter Wolff, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Wolff Line = papers co-authored together Peter Wolff links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 198220
2 19839
3
Navigation Considerations for Low-Thrust Planetary Missions
19987
4
TOPEX/POSEIDON Operational Orbit Determination Results Using Global Positioning Satellites
19944
5 19903
6
Cassini-Huygens maneuver automation for navigation
20063
7
The Millennium Development Goals - thinking beyond the Sachs report
20052
8
An improved system for hydroturbine index testing
19951
9 19881
10
Navigation Strategy and Results for New Horizons’ Approach and Flyby of the Pluto System
20151
11 20210

About Peter Wolff

Peter Wolff is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 51 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astro and Planetary Science (3 papers), Space Satellite Systems and Control (3 papers), Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks (2 papers), Fault Detection and Control Systems (2 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers), Inertial Sensor and Navigation (2 papers), Real-time simulation and control systems (1 paper) and Computational Physics and Python Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (13 citations), Education (24 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (10 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (7 citations) and Development (2 citations). Peter Wolff has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include B. Williams, R. M. Vaughan, J. Guinn, Dirk Messner, G. Bierman, Swati Mohan, Nathan Strange, M. C. Wong, C. B. Olkin and Kimberly Ennico. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Journal of Chemical Education, 26th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Econstor (Econstor) and European Journal of Science Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact