Peter W. Emery
- Physiology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 1%
- Cell Biology top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Co-authors
- T. A. B. SandersMaria PufuleteC. Elizabeth WeekesChristine BaldwinMichael J. RennieA. SpiroRoger A’HernNancy J. Rothwell
- Topics
- Muscle metabolism and nutrition (21 papers)Diet and metabolism studies (21 papers)Nutrition and Health in Aging (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Peter W. Emery
101 papers receiving 3.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 139
- Physiology 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 942
- Nutrition and Dietetics 608
- Cell Biology 484
- Surgery 470
Countries citing papers authored by Peter W. Emery
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter W. Emery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter W. Emery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter W. Emery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter W. Emery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter W. Emery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter W. Emery. The network helps show where Peter W. Emery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter W. Emery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter W. Emery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter W. Emery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter W. Emery. Peter W. Emery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 47 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 46 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | Effect of single high vs low glycemic index (GI) meal on gut hormones | 2 |
| 8 | 17 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | The role of local corticosteroid generation in inflammation-associated bone loss | 1 |
| 12 | Folate status, genomic DNA hypomethylation, and risk of colorectal adenoma and cancer | 3 |
| 13 | 223 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 147 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 82 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 148 |
About Peter W. Emery
Peter W. Emery is a scholar working on Physiology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Cell Biology, having authored 103 papers that have together received 3.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle metabolism and nutrition (21 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (21 papers) and Nutrition and Health in Aging (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (1.7k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (168 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (608 citations). Peter W. Emery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include T. A. B. Sanders, Maria Pufulete, C. Elizabeth Weekes, Christine Baldwin, Michael J. Rennie, A. Spiro, Roger A’Hern, Nancy J. Rothwell, Michael J. Stock and Victor R. Preedy. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.