Peter van Zandvoort
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Food Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- E. JacobsenJaap BakkerJeroen Rouppe van der VoortRonald C. B. HuttenJohannes HelderHerman J. van EckBernard A. van OostN.G.G.M. Abeling
- Topics
- Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers)Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers)Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter van Zandvoort
14 papers receiving 842 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Plant Science 405
- Molecular Biology 238
- Genetics 211
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 128
- Food Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Peter van Zandvoort
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter van Zandvoort's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter van Zandvoort with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter van Zandvoort more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter van Zandvoort
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter van Zandvoort. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter van Zandvoort. The network helps show where Peter van Zandvoort may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter van Zandvoort
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter van Zandvoort. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter van Zandvoort based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter van Zandvoort. Peter van Zandvoort is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 76 | |
| 10 | 93 | |
| 11 | 145 | |
| 12 | 145 | |
| 13 | X-linked borderline mental retardation with prominent behavioral disturbance: phenotype, genetic localization, and evidence for disturbed monoamine metabolism. | 256 |
| 14 | 29 |
About Peter van Zandvoort
Peter van Zandvoort is a scholar working on Immunology, Nephrology and Hematology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 887 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Pathogens and Resistance (4 papers), Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics (3 papers) and Nematode management and characterization studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (405 citations), Genetics (211 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (128 citations). Peter van Zandvoort has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include E. Jacobsen, Jaap Bakker, Jeroen Rouppe van der Voort, Ronald C. B. Hutten, Johannes Helder, Herman J. van Eck, Bernard A. van Oost, N.G.G.M. Abeling, A. H. van Gennip and Erik Ch. Wolters. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.