Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
How Regions React to Recessions: Resilience and the Role of Economic Structure
2016551 citationsRon Martin, Peter Sunley et al.Regional Studiesprofile →
Regional resilience: theoretical and empirical perspectives
2010539 citationsPeter Tyler et al.Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Societyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Tyler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Tyler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Tyler more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Tyler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Tyler. The network helps show where Peter Tyler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Tyler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Tyler.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Tyler based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Tyler. Peter Tyler is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Garretsen, Harry, Philip McCann, Ron Martin, & Peter Tyler. (2013). The future of regional policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 6(2). 179–186.38 indexed citations
11.
Garretsen, Harry, Mark Roberts, & Peter Tyler. (2011). Geography and development. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 4(2). 157–162.15 indexed citations
12.
Tyler, Peter, et al.. (2010). Factors declining cassava production in Ogori-Magongo local government area of Kogi State, Nigeria.. Journal of agricultural and biological science. 5(4). 16–18.1 indexed citations
13.
Fenton, Alex, et al.. (2010). Why do neighbourhoods stay poor? Deprivation, place and people in Birmingham: a report to the Barrow Cadbury Trust. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).5 indexed citations
14.
Gardiner, Ben, et al.. (2004). Competitiveness, Productivity and Economic Growth across the European Regions. Econstor (Econstor).147 indexed citations
15.
Baddeley, Michelle, Ron Martin, & Peter Tyler. (2001). Regional Wage Rigidity: The European Union and United States Compared. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
16.
Baddeley, Michelle, Ron Martin, & Peter Tyler. (1998). European Regional Unemployment Disparities. European Urban and Regional Studies. 5(3). 195–215.43 indexed citations
17.
Keeble, David & Peter Tyler. (1995). Enterprising Behavior and the Urban-Rural Shift. SSRN Electronic Journal.7 indexed citations
Tyler, Peter, Barry Moore, & John Rhodes. (1988). Geographical variations in costs and productivity. HMSO eBooks.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.