Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Resilience, adaptation and adaptability
2010568 citationsAndy Pike, John Tomaney et al.Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Societyprofile →
Economic Geographies of Financialization
2009304 citationsAndy Pike et al.Economic Geographyprofile →
What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?
2007283 citationsAndy Pike, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose et al.Regional Studiesprofile →
Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places
2021164 citationsDanny MacKinnon, Louise Kempton et al.Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Societyprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Andy Pike's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andy Pike with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andy Pike more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andy Pike. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andy Pike. The network helps show where Andy Pike may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andy Pike
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andy Pike.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andy Pike based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Andy Pike. Andy Pike is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
MacKinnon, Danny, Louise Kempton, Peter O’Brien, et al.. (2021). Reframing urban and regional ‘development’ for ‘left behind’ places. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 15(1). 39–56.164 indexed citations breakdown →
Pike, Andy. (2018). The limits of city centrism? We need to rethink how we approach urban and regional development. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
9.
Pike, Andy, Andrés Rodríguez‐Pose, & John Tomaney. (2016). Local and regional development: Second edition. UCL Discovery (University College London).5 indexed citations
Pike, Andy, et al.. (2015). Spatially Rebalancing the UK Economy: The Need for a New Policy Model.31 indexed citations
13.
Rodríguez‐Pose, Andrés, John Tomaney, Andy Pike, Gianpiero Torrisi, & Vassilis Tselios. (2011). Income Inequality, Decentralisation and Regional Development in Western Europe. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
14.
Torrisi, Gianpiero, Andy Pike, John Tomaney, & Vassilis Tselios. (2011). Defining and measuring decentralisation: a critical review. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich).6 indexed citations
Pike, Andy & Mário Vale. (1996). 'Greenfields' and 'Brownfields': automotive industrial development in the UK and in Portugal. Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.