Peter Tonn

680 citations
22 papers · 439 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Tonn

21 papers receiving 422 citations

Peers

Peter Tonn
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
  • Applied Psychology 52
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 118
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 106
Replace C. J. Meijer with:
C. J. Meijer Netherlands
Ryan Hays United States
Liesbeth Delesie Belgium
Mark J. Scharf United States
Benjamin H. Newberry United States
Warren W. Webb United States
W F Tsoi Singapore
Jenny García Valencia Colombia
Michael F. Detweiler United States
Michael T. Suelzer United States
Peter Tonn relative to C. J. Meijer Netherlands C. J. Meijer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.4×
C. J. Meijer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Tonn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Tonn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Tonn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Tonn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Tonn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Tonn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Tonn. The network helps show where Peter Tonn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Tonn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Tonn Line = papers co-authored together Peter Tonn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201279
2 199679
3 200943
4 200932
5 200330
6 201728
7 201826
8 201822
9 200517
10 200313
11 200712
12 202011
13
Prevalence of eating disorders and eating attacks in narcolepsy
20089
14 20068
15 20048
16 20086
17 20195
18 20044
19 20054
20 20222

About Peter Tonn

Peter Tonn is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 439 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (5 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (133 citations), Applied Psychology (52 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (62 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (106 citations). Peter Tonn has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Norbert Dahmen, Steffen Moritz, Anne Karow, Hans Sprenger, Alexander Rösler, Diethard Gemsa, Christina Andreou, Francesca Bohn, Alice Engel and Ruth Veckenstedt. Their work appears in journals such as Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Schizophrenia Bulletin, Acta Neurochirurgica, European Addiction Research and JMIR Mental Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact