Peter Smale
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 1%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Neurology top 2%
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 2
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 2
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae 2
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 1
-
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery 2
- Co-authors
- Winston D. Byblow (2 shared papers)James P. Coxon (2 shared papers)Cathy M. Stinear (2 shared papers)P. Alan Barber (2 shared papers)Melanie K. Fleming (2 shared papers)David L. Wiltshire (2 shared papers)Richard Watkins (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Stroke (1 paper)Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (1 paper)Brain (1 paper)Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- New ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Smale
5 papers receiving 762 citations
Peter Smale's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Rehabilitation 286
- Neurology 276
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 202
- Cognitive Neuroscience 159
- Neurology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Smale
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Smale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Smale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Smale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Smale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Smale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Smale. The network helps show where Peter Smale may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Smale, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity Hit paper breakdown → | 2006 | 653 |
| 2 | Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity | 2007 | 61 |
| 3 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 8 | |
| 5 | Supernova tests of the timescape cosmology | 2016 | 7 |
About Peter Smale
Peter Smale is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Rehabilitation, Instrumentation, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 5 papers that have together received 768 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (2 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (2 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (1 paper), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (286 citations), Neurology (276 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (202 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (159 citations) and Neurology (101 citations). Peter Smale has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Winston D. Byblow, James P. Coxon, Cathy M. Stinear, P. Alan Barber, Melanie K. Fleming, David L. Wiltshire and Richard Watkins. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Brain and Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.