Jonathan Tay
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Neurology top 10%
- Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
- Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
Papers in
-
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
-
- Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders 3
- Co-authors
- Hugh Stephen Markus (13 shared papers)Robin G. Morris (3 shared papers)Anil M. Tuladhar (6 shared papers)Frank‐Erik de Leeuw (6 shared papers)Daniel J. Tozer (3 shared papers)Masud Husain B (3 shared papers)Andy C. H. Lee (2 shared papers)Thomas Richard Barrick (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (2 papers)International Journal of Stroke (2 papers)Stroke (2 papers)Neurology (1 paper)Brain and Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsCanada
In The Last Decade
Jonathan Tay
15 papers receiving 438 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Rehabilitation 74
- Neurology 73
- Cognitive Neuroscience 84
- Psychiatry and Mental health 64
- Neurology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Jonathan Tay
This map shows the geographic impact of Jonathan Tay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jonathan Tay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jonathan Tay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jonathan Tay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jonathan Tay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jonathan Tay. The network helps show where Jonathan Tay may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jonathan Tay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 94 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 56 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 44 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 42 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 40 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 29 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 1 |
About Jonathan Tay
Jonathan Tay is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Rehabilitation, Epidemiology and Nuclear Energy and Engineering, having authored 15 papers that have together received 454 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders (3 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers) and Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (74 citations), Neurology (73 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (84 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (64 citations) and Neurology (13 citations). Jonathan Tay has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Hugh Stephen Markus, Robin G. Morris, Anil M. Tuladhar, Frank‐Erik de Leeuw, Daniel J. Tozer, Masud Husain B, Andy C. H. Lee, Thomas Richard Barrick, Matthew J. Hollocks and Adrian Nestor. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, International Journal of Stroke, Stroke, Neurology and Brain and Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.