Peter Scarlett
- Ecology top 2%
- Water Science and Technology top 2%
- Environmental Chemistry top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Soil Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Matthew T. O’HareMichael J. BowesLinda ArmstrongHeather WickhamSarah A. HarmanAngela M. GurnellFrançois EdwardsJ.T. Smith
- Topics
- Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (14 papers)Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers)Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenAustralia
In The Last Decade
Peter Scarlett
37 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Ecology 728
- Water Science and Technology 492
- Environmental Chemistry 488
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 439
- Soil Science 248
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Scarlett
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Scarlett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Scarlett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Scarlett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Scarlett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Scarlett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Scarlett. The network helps show where Peter Scarlett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Scarlett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Scarlett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Scarlett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Scarlett. Peter Scarlett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 60 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 127 | |
| 10 | 89 | |
| 11 | Assessment of the water quality outcomes from Agri-Environment & development of an associated Rural Development Programme (RDP) ‘impact’ indicator for Agriculture & Water Quality. Environmental Stewardship monitoring and evaluation framework request for mini-tender | 1 |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 55 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 104 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 85 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | River Habitat Survey In the Picos de Europa, Northern Spain. Results from 2008 | 3 |
| 20 | 41 |
About Peter Scarlett
Peter Scarlett is a scholar working on Environmental Chemistry, Water Science and Technology and Ecology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (14 papers), Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies (12 papers) and Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Environmental Chemistry (488 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (439 citations) and Water Science and Technology (492 citations). Peter Scarlett has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matthew T. O’Hare, Michael J. Bowes, Linda Armstrong, Heather Wickham, Sarah A. Harman, Angela M. Gurnell, François Edwards, J.T. Smith, Gareth Old and Helen P. Jarvie. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Water Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.