Emma Gardner

702 total citations
25 papers, 421 citations indexed

About

Emma Gardner is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Emma Gardner has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 421 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 7 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Emma Gardner's work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Emma Gardner is often cited by papers focused on Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers). Emma Gardner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Emma Gardner's co-authors include Chris Done, M. J. Ward, Chichuan Jin, Simon G. Potts, Robin J. Boyd, Luke C. Evans, Alice S. A. Johnston, Tom D. Breeze, Duncan Whyatt and Alona Armstrong and has published in prestigious journals such as Water Research, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Emma Gardner

23 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Emma Gardner United Kingdom 13 209 101 101 55 53 25 421
Kangujam Priyokumar Singh India 7 136 0.7× 87 0.9× 99 1.0× 6 0.1× 42 0.8× 41 306
Michele Fiori Italy 9 50 0.2× 54 0.5× 26 0.3× 10 0.2× 40 0.8× 23 275
Yuval Rosenberg Israel 5 70 0.3× 33 0.3× 44 0.4× 14 0.3× 53 1.0× 8 287
Andreas Botnen United States 7 67 0.3× 67 0.7× 10 0.1× 12 0.2× 135 2.5× 12 410
Stanisław Zięba Poland 11 184 0.9× 32 0.3× 8 0.1× 72 1.3× 38 0.7× 52 386
Jean‐François Robitaille Canada 14 111 0.5× 34 0.3× 12 0.1× 14 0.3× 300 5.7× 30 484
Zhirui Wang United States 16 403 1.9× 31 0.3× 577 5.7× 22 0.4× 135 2.5× 37 847
Amanda F. Linnell Nemec Canada 12 209 1.0× 33 0.3× 22 0.2× 86 1.6× 53 1.0× 33 541
Peter R. Law South Africa 12 53 0.3× 69 0.7× 29 0.3× 5 0.1× 255 4.8× 37 437
Sharon L. Montgomery United States 7 113 0.5× 75 0.7× 4 0.0× 13 0.2× 98 1.8× 13 298

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Gardner. The network helps show where Emma Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma Gardner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma Gardner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma Gardner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma Gardner. Emma Gardner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Gardner, Emma, et al.. (2025). ECOBRIDGE: An expert system for spatial downscaling of land use/land cover change scenario outputs. Environmental Modelling & Software. 193. 106616–106616.
3.
Balzter, Heiko, Tom D. Breeze, Robbie D. Girling, et al.. (2024). Adapting genetic algorithms for multifunctional landscape decisions: A theoretical case study on wild bees and farmers in the UK. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 15(11). 2153–2167. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cole, Beth, Andrew V. Bradley, Simon Willcock, et al.. (2023). Using a multi‐lens framework for landscape decisions. People and Nature. 5(4). 1050–1071. 7 indexed citations
5.
Gardner, Emma, et al.. (2023). Improving attitudes towards adders (Vipera berus) and nature connectedness in primary‐age group children. People and Nature. 5(6). 1908–1921. 3 indexed citations
6.
Gardner, Emma, et al.. (2022). Solar park management and design to boost bumble bee populations. Environmental Research Letters. 17(4). 44002–44002. 28 indexed citations
7.
Gardner, Emma, Yann Clough, William E. Kunin, et al.. (2022). Which interventions contribute most to the net effect of England’s agri-environment schemes on pollination services?. Landscape Ecology. 38(1). 271–291. 7 indexed citations
8.
Gardner, Emma, Tom D. Breeze, Yann Clough, et al.. (2021). Field boundary features can stabilise bee populations and the pollination of mass‐flowering crops in rotational systems. Journal of Applied Ecology. 58(10). 2287–2304. 17 indexed citations
9.
Gardner, Emma, Tom D. Breeze, Yann Clough, et al.. (2020). Reliably predicting pollinator abundance: Challenges of calibrating process‐based ecological models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 11(12). 1673–1689. 27 indexed citations
10.
Gardner, Emma, Thomas Hesselberg, Ada Grabowska-Zhang, & Jocelyne Hughes. (2019). The effect of woodland area on avian community composition in a fragmented southern UK landscape and associated management recommendations. Bird Study. 66(3). 293–305. 3 indexed citations
11.
Gardner, Emma. (2019). Make the Adder Count: population trends from a citizen science survey of UK adders. Herpetological Journal. 57–70. 14 indexed citations
12.
Johnston, Alice S. A., et al.. (2019). Predicting population responses to environmental change from individual-level mechanisms: towards a standardized mechanistic approach. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 286(1913). 20191916–20191916. 55 indexed citations
13.
Landt, Hermine, M. J. Ward, Chris Done, et al.. (2017). The relativistic jet of the γ-ray emitting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy 1H 0323+342. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 475(1). 404–423. 19 indexed citations
14.
Gardner, Emma & Chris Done. (2017). The origin of the UV/optical lags in NGC 5548. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 470(3). 3591–3605. 80 indexed citations
15.
Jin, Chichuan, Chris Done, M. J. Ward, & Emma Gardner. (2017). Super-Eddington QSO RX J0439.6-5311 – II. Multiwavelength constraints on the global structure of the accretion flow. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 471(1). 706–721. 39 indexed citations
16.
Hoo, Zhe Hui, et al.. (2015). Promoting adherence to nebulized therapy in cystic fibrosis: poster development and a qualitative exploration of adherence. Patient Preference and Adherence. 9. 1109–1109. 9 indexed citations
17.
Gardner, Emma & Chris Done. (2013). What powers the most relativistic jets? – I. BL Lacs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 438(1). 779–788. 12 indexed citations
18.
Gardner, Emma & Chris Done. (2013). Jets and the accretion flow in low-luminosity black holes. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 434(4). 3454–3462. 14 indexed citations
19.
Gardner, Emma, et al.. (1991). Nation's hospitals brace for casualties.. PubMed. 21(3). 2–3. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gardner, Emma. (1989). A direct line between buyer and supplier.. PubMed. 19(11). 26–8. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026