Emma Gardner

702 citations
25 papers · 421 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Gardner

23 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Emma Gardner
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 209
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 101
  • Ecological Modeling 31
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 101
  • Insect Science 55
Replace Kangujam Priyokumar Singh with:
Kangujam Priyokumar Singh India
Michele Fiori Italy
Yuval Rosenberg Israel
Peter R. Law South Africa
Stanisław Zięba Poland
Jean‐François Robitaille Canada
Amanda F. Linnell Nemec Canada
Andreas Botnen United States
Sharon L. Montgomery United States
R. J. Williams United Kingdom
Emma Gardner relative to Kangujam Priyokumar Singh India Kangujam Priyokumar Singh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.2×
Kangujam Priyokumar Singh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Gardner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Gardner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Gardner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Gardner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Gardner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Gardner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Gardner. The network helps show where Emma Gardner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Gardner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Gardner Line = papers co-authored together Emma Gardner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201780
2 201955
3 201739
4 202228
5 202027
6 201425
7 202124
8 201719
9 201718
10 202117
11 201314
12 201914
13 201312
14 201510
15 20159
16 20237
17 20227
18 20227
19 20233
20 20193

About Emma Gardner

Emma Gardner is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change and Plant Science, having authored 25 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (8 papers), Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (4 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (209 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (101 citations), Ecological Modeling (31 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (101 citations) and Insect Science (55 citations). Emma Gardner has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Chris Done, M. J. Ward, Chichuan Jin, Simon G. Potts, Luke C. Evans, Alice S. A. Johnston, Robin J. Boyd, Tom D. Breeze, Alona Armstrong and Duncan Whyatt. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, People and Nature, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, Patient Preference and Adherence and Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact