Peter Mackereth

63 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Peter Mackereth
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 302
  • Research and Theory 11
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 16
  • Oncology 180
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 89
Replace Janet R. Kahn with:
Janet R. Kahn United States
Bettina Berger Germany
Robin Davidson United Kingdom
Kristin A. Zernicke Canada
Maja Johannsen Denmark
Sylvia van Beugen Netherlands
Anne A. Moore United States
Jennifer Deane United Kingdom
Amritanshu Ram India
Jane S. Blake-Mortimer Australia
Peter Mackereth relative to Janet R. Kahn United States Janet R. Kahn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Janet R. Kahn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mackereth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mackereth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mackereth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mackereth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Mackereth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mackereth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mackereth. The network helps show where Peter Mackereth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Mackereth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Mackereth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Mackereth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012184
2 201362
3 200840
4 200422
5 198919
6 202216
7 200916
8 200014
9 199513
10 200511
11 199711
12 202211
13 200010
14 20099
15 20089
16 20129
17 20209
18 20169
19 19949
20 20109

About Peter Mackereth

Peter Mackereth is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Research and Theory, Complementary and Manual Therapy, General Health Professions and Occupational Therapy, having authored 66 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (22 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (7 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (5 papers), Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers) and Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (302 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (16 citations), Oncology (180 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (89 citations). Peter Mackereth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alex Molassiotis, Jennifer Finnegan-John, Emma Ream, Alison Richardson, Jacqueline Filshie, David Ryder, Ann‐Louise Caress, Katie Booth, V F Hillier and Jacqui Stringer. Their work appears in journals such as Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Acupuncture in Medicine and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact