Peter Kruse

2.9k citations
112 papers · 2.2k indexed · h-index 27

Peter Kruse

110 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Peter Kruse
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Software 222
  • Bioengineering 307
  • Electrochemistry 191
  • Materials Chemistry 1000
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 990
Replace Bruno Dufour with:
Bruno Dufour United States
Thomas Fischer Germany
Yuhua Dong China
Zhi‐Hong Liu China
Jang‐Soo Lee South Korea
Junjie Mao China
Kyungtae Kim South Korea
Weigen Chen China
J.‐P. Diard France
Du Zhang China
Peter Kruse relative to Bruno Dufour United States Bruno Dufour's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Bruno Dufour · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Kruse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Kruse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Kruse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Kruse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Kruse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Kruse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Kruse. The network helps show where Peter Kruse may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Kruse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Kruse Line = papers co-authored together Peter Kruse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20245
2 20236
3 20238
4 202213
5 20211
6 20214
7 202066
8 201813
9
Klassifikationsbäume als Testrahmen für den Modultest automatisiert erzeugen.
20151
10
Assessing the Applicability of a Combinatorial Testing tool within an Industrial Environment.
20144
11
Systematic Testing of Web Applications with the Classification Tree Method.
20144
12 20142
13 20136
14
Automated Test Case Generation Using Classification Trees
201019
15 20103
16 200917
17 200913
18 20094
19 200443
20 200018

About Peter Kruse

Peter Kruse is a scholar working on Software, Bioengineering, Electrochemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Materials Chemistry, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Analytical Chemistry and Sensors (27 papers), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (27 papers), Electrochemical sensors and biosensors (19 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (19 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (13 papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (12 papers), Graphene research and applications (11 papers) and Carbon Nanotubes in Composites (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (222 citations), Bioengineering (307 citations), Electrochemistry (191 citations), Materials Chemistry (1000 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (990 citations). Peter Kruse has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and Spain. Frequent co-authors include P. Ravi Selvaganapathy, Kevin R. Moonoosawmy, Robert A. Wolkow, Gino A. DiLabio, Andrew C. Kummel, Shayan Angizi, Mark C. Biesinger, Huan‐Hsuan Hsu, Vinay Patel and James McLean. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics, Nano Letters and Review of Scientific Instruments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026