Peter J. Smailes

884 citations
30 papers · 674 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Smailes

29 papers receiving 555 citations

Peers

Peter J. Smailes
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 397
  • Urban Studies 109
  • Demography 215
  • Sociology and Political Science 255
  • Transportation 38
Replace PJ Cloke with:
PJ Cloke United Kingdom
Tony Sörensen Australia
Johan Fredrik Rye Norway
Peter B. Nelson United States
Jesse Heley United Kingdom
Luís Camarero Spain
A. J. Fielding United Kingdom
Jim Walmsley Australia
Linda Lundmark Sweden
Richard B. Le Heron New Zealand
Peter J. Smailes relative to PJ Cloke United Kingdom PJ Cloke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
PJ Cloke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smailes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smailes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smailes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smailes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Smailes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smailes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smailes. The network helps show where Peter J. Smailes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Smailes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Smailes Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Smailes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1985100
2 200296
3 200792
4 200259
5 199738
6 198532
7 200527
8 200027
9 199227
10 201425
11 199524
12 196917
13 200115
14 199615
15 201810
16 19659
17
Defining social catchments in non-metroplitan Australia
20019
18 19798
19
Leadership and community in the Gilbert Valley, South Australia: a study of resilience and regrouping
20027
20 19827

About Peter J. Smailes

Peter J. Smailes is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Demography, Education and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 30 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (22 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (9 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (6 papers), Education Systems and Policy (5 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (3 papers), Australian History and Society (3 papers), Land Rights and Reforms (2 papers) and Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (397 citations), Urban Studies (109 citations), Demography (215 citations), Sociology and Political Science (255 citations) and Transportation (38 citations). Peter J. Smailes has collaborated with scholars based in Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Neil Argent, Trevor Louis Charles Griffin, Graeme Hugo, David J. Brunckhorst, Colin J. Macgregor, M.M. Fenton, David Burch and Roy E. Rickson. Their work appears in journals such as Australian Geographer, Journal of Rural Studies, Geographical Research, Land Use Policy and Population and Environment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact