Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Magnitudes of sea-level lowstands of the past 500,000 years
1998504 citationsEelco J. Rohling, M.M. Fenton et al.Natureprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of M.M. Fenton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.M. Fenton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.M. Fenton more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.M. Fenton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.M. Fenton. The network helps show where M.M. Fenton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.M. Fenton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.M. Fenton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.M. Fenton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with M.M. Fenton. M.M. Fenton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (2006). Geochemical soil survey over the K4B kimberlite, Buffalo Head Hills, northern Alberta.1 indexed citations
4.
Paulen, R C, et al.. (2005). Kimberlite-Indicator Mineral Till Survey of the Sawn Lake Area (NTS 84B/13), Southern Buffalo Head Hills, Alberta.1 indexed citations
5.
Hugo, Graeme, Peter J. Smailes, Colin J. Macgregor, M.M. Fenton, & David J. Brunckhorst. (2001). Defining social catchments in non-metroplitan Australia. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).9 indexed citations
6.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (2000). Quaternary Geology Northern Alberta: Information Sources and Implications for Diamond Exploration.3 indexed citations
Rohling, Eelco J., M.M. Fenton, Frans Jorissen, et al.. (1998). Magnitudes of sea-level lowstands of the past 500,000 years. Nature. 394(6689). 162–165.504 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (1998). Diamond Indicator Minerals from Auger Core Holes, A Possible Second Dispersal Train in the Peerless Lake Map Area (84B).1 indexed citations
11.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (1996). Preliminary Stratigraphic Tests to Support Mineral Exploration: Northern Alberta.1 indexed citations
12.
Schmitt, Douglas R., et al.. (1995). The Diamond Potential of Alberta.6 indexed citations
13.
Olson, Rebecca, et al.. (1993). The Diamond Potential of Alberta: A Regional Synthesis of the Structural and Stratigraphic Setting, and Other Preliminary Indications of Diamond Potential.1 indexed citations
14.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (1987). Surface Geophysical Coal Research Project 1984-1986.1 indexed citations
15.
Fenton, M.M., Stephen R. Moran, James T. Teller, & Lee Clayton. (1983). Quaternary Stratigraphy and History In the Southern Part of the Lake Agassiz Basin.83 indexed citations
16.
Fenton, M.M., et al.. (1982). Overburden or Quaternary Stratigraphy, Firebag River; Northeastern Alberta: Preliminary Report.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.