Peter J. Minogue
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Genetics top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Physiology
- Cell Biology
- Co-authors
- Eric C. BeyerViviana M. BerthoudLisa EbiharaAlexandra LichtensteinRichard T. MathiasJunyuan GaoJunjie TongOscar Jara
- Topics
- Connexins and lens biology (39 papers)Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (17 papers)Heat shock proteins research (17 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United StatesChileUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter J. Minogue
38 papers receiving 944 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 914
- Genetics 334
- Ophthalmology 126
- Physiology 94
- Cell Biology 70
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Minogue
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Minogue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Minogue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Minogue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Minogue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Minogue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Minogue. The network helps show where Peter J. Minogue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter J. Minogue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter J. Minogue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter J. Minogue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter J. Minogue. Peter J. Minogue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | p62/Sequestosome 1 levels increase and phosphorylation is altered in Cx50D47A lenses, but deletion of p62/sequestosome 1 does not improve transparency. | 3 |
| 5 | CHOP is dispensable for lens transparency in wild-type and connexin50 mutant mice. | 4 |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 28 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | The GJA8 allele encoding CX50I247M is a rare polymorphism, not a cataract-causing mutation. | 12 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 63 | |
| 16 | 25 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 75 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Peter J. Minogue
Peter J. Minogue is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology and Aging, having authored 40 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Connexins and lens biology (39 papers), Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research (17 papers) and Heat shock proteins research (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (126 citations), Molecular Biology (914 citations) and Genetics (334 citations). Peter J. Minogue has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Chile and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Eric C. Beyer, Viviana M. Berthoud, Lisa Ebihara, Alexandra Lichtenstein, Richard T. Mathias, Junyuan Gao, Junjie Tong, Oscar Jara, Anthony T. Moore and Xiaoqin Liu. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.