Peter Gries

2.6k total citations
68 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Peter Gries is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Gries has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 47 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 25 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 14 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Peter Gries's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers). Peter Gries is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers) and International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers). Peter Gries collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Peter Gries's co-authors include H. Michael Crowson, Stanley Rosen, Huajian Cai, Chi‐yue Chiu, Shirley Y. Y. Cheng, Carlos J. Torelli, Emanuele Castano, Qingmin Zhang, Simona Sacchi and Tao Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Foreign Affairs, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Social Issues.

In The Last Decade

Peter Gries

65 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Peter Gries United States	23	940	568	286	193	107	68	1.3k
Stephen G. Walker United States	19	836 0.9×	816 1.4×	198 0.7×	80 0.4×	12 0.1×	53	1.3k
Gal Ariely Israel	19	782 0.8×	375 0.7×	144 0.5×	298 1.5×	20 0.2×	46	1.1k
David Carment Canada	18	694 0.7×	336 0.6×	147 0.5×	48 0.2×	19 0.2×	85	1.0k
Damarys Canache United States	18	974 1.0×	671 1.2×	146 0.5×	225 1.2×	8 0.1×	34	1.4k
Richard Flacks United States	17	795 0.8×	253 0.4×	161 0.6×	97 0.5×	36 0.3×	50	1.4k
Jeffrey C. Alexander United States	8	883 0.9×	275 0.5×	77 0.3×	148 0.8×	28 0.3×	16	1.2k
Fred Dallmayr United States	17	682 0.7×	484 0.9×	57 0.2×	44 0.2×	49 0.5×	150	1.3k
Ayhan Kaya Türkiye	19	756 0.8×	559 1.0×	57 0.2×	42 0.2×	57 0.5×	92	1.1k
Mark Tessler United States	20	1.3k 1.3×	646 1.1×	71 0.2×	103 0.5×	7 0.1×	75	1.6k
Jonathan Renshon United States	19	754 0.8×	666 1.2×	160 0.6×	58 0.3×	4 0.0×	31	1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gries

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gries

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gries. The network helps show where Peter Gries may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Gries

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Gries. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Gries based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Gries. Peter Gries is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2025). The White gaze in racial stereotype research: Sample bias and its consequences. British Journal of Social Psychology. 64(2). e12889–e12889.

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2024). Intersectional race–gender stereotypes in natural language. British Journal of Social Psychology. 63(4). 1771–1786. 4 indexed citations

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2022). How History Wars Shape Foreign Policy: An Ancient Kingdom and the Future of China–South Korea Relations. Journal of East Asian Studies. 22(1). 1–21. 6 indexed citations

Summers, Tim, et al.. (2021). Worsening British views of China in 2020: evidence from public opinion, parliament, and the media. Asia Europe Journal. 20(2). 173–194. 6 indexed citations

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2020). Proscribing the “Spiritually Japanese”: Nationalist Indignation, Authoritarian Responsiveness and Regime Legitimation in China Today. The China Quarterly. 245. 122–141. 4 indexed citations

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2020). Ideology and international relations. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 34. 135–141. 11 indexed citations

Gries, Peter & Tao Wang. (2019). Will China Seize Taiwan. Foreign Affairs. 3 indexed citations

Mader, Matthias, Thomas J. Scotto, Jason Reifler, et al.. (2018). How political are national identities? A comparison of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany in the 2010s. Research & Politics. 5(3). 25 indexed citations

Jing, Yiming, Peter Gries, Yang Li, et al.. (2017). War or Peace? How the Subjective Perception of Great Power Interdependence Shapes Preemptive Defensive Aggression. Frontiers in Psychology. 8. 864–864. 10 indexed citations

10.

Su, Jenny, Peter Gries, I‐Ching Lee, & Alisia G. T. T. Tran. (2017). Linking parental socialization about discrimination to intergroup attitudes: The role of social dominance orientation and cultural identification.. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology. 23(3). 435–444.

11.

Clements, Ben & Peter Gries. (2016). “Religious Nones” in the United Kingdom: How Atheists and Agnostics Think about Religion and Politics. Politics and Religion. 10(1). 161–185. 8 indexed citations

12.

Gries, Peter & Matthew R. Sanders. (2016). How Socialization Shapes Chinese Views of America and the World. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 17(1). 1–21. 5 indexed citations

13.

Gries, Peter. (2014). “Red China” and the “Yellow Peril”: How Ideology Divides Americans over China. Journal of East Asian Studies. 14(3). 317–346. 4 indexed citations

14.

Gries, Peter. (2014). The Politics of American Foreign Policy. 1 indexed citations

15.

Gries, Peter & Jenny Su. (2013). Taiwanese Views of China and the World: Party Identification, Ethnicity, and Cross–Strait Relations. Japanese Journal of Political Science. 14(1). 73–96. 12 indexed citations

16.

Gries, Peter. (2012). Disillusionment and Dismay: How Chinese Netizens Think and Feel About the Two Koreas. Journal of East Asian Studies. 12(1). 31–56. 11 indexed citations

17.

Gries, Peter. (2012). Disillusionment and dismay: How Chinese netizens think and feel about the two Koreas. Journal of East Asian Studies. 12(1). 31–56. 6 indexed citations

18.

Gries, Peter, et al.. (2009). Contentious Histories and the Perception of Threat: China, the United States, and the Korean War—An Experimental Analysis. Journal of East Asian Studies. 9(3). 433–465. 8 indexed citations

19.

Gries, Peter. (2005). Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a ‘China Threat’ Inevitable?. European Journal of International Relations. 11(2). 235–265. 40 indexed citations

20.

Gries, Peter. (2004). China's New NationalismPride, Politics, and Diplomacy. 87 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact