Peter Gries

2.6k citations
68 papers · 1.3k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Gries

65 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Gries
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Communication 193
  • Political Science and International Relations 568
  • Development 81
  • Sociology and Political Science 940
  • Social Psychology 286
Replace Stephen G. Walker with:
Stephen G. Walker United States
Ayhan Kaya Türkiye
Mark Tessler United States
Fred Dallmayr United States
Jeffrey C. Alexander United States
David Carment Canada
Gal Ariely Israel
Isaac Ariail Reed United States
Alexandra Jaffe United States
Enrique Laraña Spain
Peter Gries relative to Stephen G. Walker United States Stephen G. Walker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Stephen G. Walker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Gries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Gries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Gries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Gries more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Gries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Gries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Gries. The network helps show where Peter Gries may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Gries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Gries Line = papers co-authored together Peter Gries links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011137
2 200487
3 200479
4 201177
5 201474
6 200362
7 200149
8 200547
9 200540
10 201539
11 200537
12 201035
13 200231
14 201330
15 201227
16 201027
17 201825
18
A 'China threat'? Power and passion in Chinese 'face nationalism'
199925
19 200523
20 201523

About Peter Gries

Peter Gries is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Communication and Cultural Studies, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (14 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (11 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (8 papers), Social Media and Politics (7 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (5 papers) and Political Conflict and Governance (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (193 citations), Political Science and International Relations (568 citations), Development (81 citations), Sociology and Political Science (940 citations) and Social Psychology (286 citations). Peter Gries has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include H. Michael Crowson, Stanley Rosen, Huajian Cai, Shirley Y. Y. Cheng, Carlos J. Torelli, Chi‐yue Chiu, Emanuele Castano, Qingmin Zhang, Simona Sacchi and Tao Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of East Asian Studies, The China Quarterly, Journal of Contemporary China, Orbis and Journal of Social Issues.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact