Journal of East Asian Studies

410 papers and 3.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 410 papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies usually cover Political Science and International Relations (292 papers), Sociology and Political Science (257 papers) and Strategy and Management (43 papers) specifically the topics of Electoral Systems and Political Participation (89 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (80 papers) and Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of East Asian Studies are Edward Aspinall, Joseph Wong, Thomas B. Pepinsky, Aihwa Ong, Ming‐sho Ho, Andrei Lankov, Paul D. Hutchcroft, Joel Rocamora, Victor Shih and T. J. Pempel.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of East Asian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of East Asian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of East Asian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of East Asian Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025