Peter Goodridge

679 citations
26 papers · 391 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Goodridge

26 papers receiving 357 citations

Peers

Peter Goodridge
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Economics and Econometrics 280
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 74
  • Media Technology 50
  • Strategy and Management 83
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 20
Replace Timothy Destefano with:
Timothy Destefano United States
Harald Edquist Sweden
Jonathan Timmis United States
Michal S. Gal Israel
Mark Shurmer United Kingdom
Per Botolf Maurseth Norway
Björn Wellenius Chile
Paolo Sylos Labini Italy
Ksenija Dumičić Croatia
Jae‐Yong Choung South Korea
Peter Goodridge relative to Timothy Destefano United States Timothy Destefano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
Timothy Destefano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goodridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goodridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goodridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goodridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goodridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goodridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goodridge. The network helps show where Peter Goodridge may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goodridge, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goodridge Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goodridge links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201960
2 201859
3 201256
4 201634
5 201333
6 201620
7 201217
8 201113
9 200810
10 201910
11 202110
12 200710
13 20148
14 20077
15 20117
16 20236
17 20116
18 20095
19 20074
20 20114

About Peter Goodridge

Peter Goodridge is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 26 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Productivity (18 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (6 papers), Regional Development and Policy (6 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (5 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (3 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (2 papers) and ICT Impact and Policies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (280 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (74 citations), Media Technology (50 citations), Strategy and Management (83 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (20 citations). Peter Goodridge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan Haskel, Harald Edquist, Gavin Wallis, Annarosa Pesole, Xuan Li, Carol Corrado and Mark N. Franklin. Their work appears in journals such as Economica, Review of Income and Wealth, Journal of Comparative Economics, Information Economics and Policy and Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact