Review of Income and Wealth

1.8k papers and 38.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.8k papers published in Review of Income and Wealth in the last decades have received a total of 38.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Income and Wealth usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), Sociology and Political Science (717 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (391 papers) specifically the topics of Income, Poverty, and Inequality (607 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (446 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (252 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Income and Wealth are Robert Summers, Alan Heston, Edward N. Wolff, T. P. Hill, Timothy M. Smeeding, Nanak Kakwani, Martin Ravallion, Dale W. Jorgenson, Francisco H. G. Ferreira and Stanislav Kolenikov.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Income and Wealth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Income and Wealth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Income and Wealth.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Income and Wealth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Income and Wealth. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Income and Wealth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Income and Wealth more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025