Peter Daiser
Impact in
- Public Administration top 5%
- Public Policy and Administration Research
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Papers in
-
- E-Government and Public Services 11
-
- Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 7
- Co-authors
- Bernd W. Wirtz (21 shared papers)Vincent Göttel (2 shared papers)Daniel Schmitt (1 shared paper)Tamyko Ysa (1 shared paper)Linda Mory (2 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Peter Daiser
20 papers receiving 584 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- Public Administration 68
- Information Systems and Management 93
- Strategy and Management 189
- Communication 87
- Political Science and International Relations 283
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Daiser
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Daiser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Daiser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Daiser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Daiser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Daiser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Daiser. The network helps show where Peter Daiser may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Peter Daiser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 98 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 78 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 73 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 69 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 52 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 45 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 10 | Social Networks: Usage Intensity and Effects on Personalized Advertising | 2017 | 15 |
| 11 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 15 | Measuring eGovernment Portal Management on the Local Level: Results from a Survey of Public Administration Officials | 2014 | 6 |
| 16 | 2016 | 6 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 2 |
About Peter Daiser
Peter Daiser is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Information Systems and Management, Communication, Sociology and Political Science and Strategy and Management, having authored 23 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include E-Government and Public Services (11 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (7 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (4 papers), Social Media and Politics (3 papers), Corporate Governance and Management (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (2 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (68 citations), Information Systems and Management (93 citations), Strategy and Management (189 citations), Communication (87 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (283 citations). Peter Daiser has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Bernd W. Wirtz, Vincent Göttel, Daniel Schmitt, Tamyko Ysa and Linda Mory. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Public Administration, Public Management Review, International Review of Administrative Sciences, Creative Industries Journal and Journal of electronic commerce research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.