Peter Choate

26 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

Peter Choate
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Public Administration 35
  • Safety Research 64
  • Clinical Psychology 153
  • Health 52
  • General Health Professions 110
Replace Dana M. Hollinshead with:
Dana M. Hollinshead United States
An‐Pyng Sun United States
Debbie Noble‐Carr Australia
Helen Richardson Foster United Kingdom
Miriam Maclean Australia
Quenette L. Walton United States
Joanne Filippelli Canada
Luciana C. Assini‐Meytin United States
Jennifer Lawson United States
Helen Cahalane United States
Peter Choate relative to Dana M. Hollinshead United States Dana M. Hollinshead's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dana M. Hollinshead · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Choate

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Choate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Choate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Choate more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Choate

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Choate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Choate. The network helps show where Peter Choate may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter Choate, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Choate Line = papers co-authored together Peter Choate links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201540
2 201439
3 201826
4 201119
5 201917
6 202116
7 202216
8 201914
9 201514
10 202012
11 202210
12 20218
13 20218
14
Psychometrics in Parenting Capacity Assessments – A problem for First Nations parents
20157
15 20217
16 20197
17 20226
18 20204
19 20163
20 20203

About Peter Choate

Peter Choate is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Safety Research, having authored 28 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (15 papers), Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects (10 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (10 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (8 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Social Work Education and Practice (4 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (35 citations), Safety Research (64 citations), Clinical Psychology (153 citations), Health (52 citations) and General Health Professions (110 citations). Peter Choate has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Russia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Dorothy Badry, Bruce MacLaurin, Alan McLuckie, Katherine Bright, Jacqueline Smith, Jennifer Smith, Andrew C. H. Szeto, Sarah Orton, Justin J. Mitchell and Lenora Marcellus. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, The British Journal of Social Work, Journal of Social Work Education, Social Sciences and Child Care in Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact