Albert W. Dzur
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Clinical Psychology
- Law top 2%
- Co-authors
- Rekha MirchandaniCarolyn M. HendriksAlan WertheimerJanice NadlerMichelle C. KeglerRobert P. BurnsJerusha ConnerMing Hu
- Topics
- Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers)Law in Society and Culture (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaChina
In The Last Decade
Albert W. Dzur
42 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Sociology and Political Science 262
- Political Science and International Relations 102
- General Health Professions 83
- Clinical Psychology 78
- Law 68
Countries citing papers authored by Albert W. Dzur
This map shows the geographic impact of Albert W. Dzur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert W. Dzur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert W. Dzur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Albert W. Dzur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert W. Dzur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert W. Dzur. The network helps show where Albert W. Dzur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert W. Dzur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert W. Dzur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert W. Dzur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Albert W. Dzur. Albert W. Dzur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | Democracy Inside: Participatory Innovation in Unlikely Places | 15 |
| 4 | White Paper of Democratic Criminal Justice | 1 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | A Different Kind of Politics: Readings on the Role of Higher Education in Democracy | 2 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 28 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About Albert W. Dzur
Albert W. Dzur is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 47 papers that have together received 449 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (16 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers) and Law in Society and Culture (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (27 citations), Law (68 citations) and Communication (47 citations). Albert W. Dzur has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and China. Frequent co-authors include Rekha Mirchandani, Carolyn M. Hendriks, Alan Wertheimer, Janice Nadler, Michelle C. Kegler, Robert P. Burns, Jerusha Conner, Ming Hu, Paul W. Speer and Astraea Augsberger. Their work appears in journals such as Law & Society Review, Political Studies and Political Research Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.