Peter Campbell

846 total citations
47 papers, 473 citations indexed

About

Peter Campbell is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Clinical Psychology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Campbell has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 473 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Ophthalmology, 11 papers in Clinical Psychology and 11 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Peter Campbell's work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Peter Campbell is often cited by papers focused on Glaucoma and retinal disorders (16 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers) and Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers). Peter Campbell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Peter Campbell's co-authors include Thurstine Basset, Jill Anderson, David F. Edgar, David Cameron, David P. Crabb, Pete R. Jones, Lee Jones, Bruce J. W. Evans, Phil Barker and Ben Davidson and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Vision Research and American Journal of Ophthalmology.

In The Last Decade

Peter Campbell

42 papers receiving 432 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Peter Campbell United Kingdom 12 194 135 126 109 63 47 473
Caroline Nicolas Australia 10 77 0.4× 86 0.6× 67 0.5× 114 1.0× 14 0.2× 24 445
Craig Kennedy Australia 14 129 0.7× 106 0.8× 75 0.6× 17 0.2× 6 0.1× 20 387
Sara Shahbazi Iran 10 69 0.4× 32 0.2× 10 0.1× 105 1.0× 73 1.2× 34 378
Kevin M. Jackson United States 5 27 0.1× 20 0.1× 73 0.6× 10 0.1× 51 0.8× 9 217
Dorte Malig Rasmussen Denmark 7 67 0.3× 17 0.1× 18 0.1× 19 0.2× 9 0.1× 10 343
Amal Minocha United Kingdom 5 95 0.5× 32 0.2× 34 0.3× 138 1.3× 44 0.7× 9 335
Soleiman Ahmady Iran 12 87 0.4× 9 0.1× 21 0.2× 84 0.8× 116 1.8× 51 450
Akhilesh S Pathipati United States 7 98 0.5× 40 0.3× 52 0.4× 7 0.1× 10 0.2× 11 308
Bei Lu Australia 9 96 0.5× 127 0.9× 140 1.1× 7 0.1× 5 0.1× 21 379

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Campbell. The network helps show where Peter Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Campbell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Campbell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Campbell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Campbell. Peter Campbell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Dreizin, David, Lei Zhang, Uttam K. Bodanapally, et al.. (2023). Accelerating voxelwise annotation of cross-sectional imaging through AI collaborative labeling with quality assurance and bias mitigation. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 3 indexed citations
3.
Subramanian, Ahalya, et al.. (2023). Barriers and enablers to medication adherence in glaucoma: A systematic review of modifiable factors using the Theoretical Domains Framework. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 44(1). 96–114. 4 indexed citations
4.
Vaddavalli, Pravin K., et al.. (2023). Suprathreshold contrast perception of resolvable high spatial frequencies remain intact in keratoconus. Vision Research. 212. 108310–108310. 1 indexed citations
5.
Campbell, Peter, et al.. (2023). Prostate cancer and podcasts: an analysis and assessment of the quality of information about prostate cancer available on podcasts. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases. 27(1). 153–154. 2 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Lei, et al.. (2023). Pulmonary contusion: automated deep learning-based quantitative visualization. Emergency Radiology. 30(4). 435–441. 8 indexed citations
7.
Campbell, Peter, David F. Edgar, & Rakhee Shah. (2021). Inter-optometrist variability of IOP measurement for modern tonometers and their agreement with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry. Clinical and Experimental Optometry. 104(5). 602–610. 1 indexed citations
8.
Shah, Rakhee, David F. Edgar, Peter Campbell, et al.. (2021). Referrals from community optometrists to the hospital eye service in Scotland and England. Eye. 36(9). 1754–1760. 8 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Lee, Peter Campbell, Pete R. Jones, et al.. (2021). Acceptability of a home-based visual field test (Eyecatcher) for glaucoma home monitoring: a qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. BMJ Open. 11(4). e043130–e043130. 18 indexed citations
10.
Campbell, Peter, Roland J. Thorpe, Jacqueline Agnew, et al.. (2021). A conceptual framework to address administrative and infection control barriers for animal-assisted intervention programs in healthcare facilities: Perspectives from a qualitative study. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 43(4). 531–533. 1 indexed citations
11.
Jones, Pete R., et al.. (2020). Glaucoma Home Monitoring Using a Tablet-Based Visual Field Test (Eyecatcher): An Assessment of Accuracy and Adherence Over 6 Months. American Journal of Ophthalmology. 223. 42–52. 48 indexed citations
12.
Akhtar, Amna, et al.. (2020). Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults. Journal of Optometry. 14(1). 86–91. 6 indexed citations
14.
Campbell, Peter, et al.. (2019). Healthy shopper? Blood pressure testing in a shopping centre Pop-Up in England. BMC Public Health. 19(1). 42–42. 6 indexed citations
15.
Campbell, Peter, et al.. (2017). Patient Outcomes for a Glaucoma Referral Refinement Clinic. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 5313–5313. 1 indexed citations
16.
Campbell, Peter, Rishi Agarwal, Tony Redmond, Kin Sheng Lim, & Bruce J. W. Evans. (2014). Repeatability and Comparison of Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Tests. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 933–933. 3 indexed citations
17.
Cameron, David, et al.. (2005). Releasing the therapeutic potential of the psychiatric nurse: a human relations perspective of the nurse–patient relationship. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 12(1). 64–74. 39 indexed citations
18.
Cutcliffe, John R. & Peter Campbell. (2002). Nurse Prescribing: A Step in the Right Direction or Undermining the Nature of Mental Health Nursing?. Mental Health Practice. 5(5). 14–17. 5 indexed citations
19.
Barker, Phil, Peter Campbell, & Ben Davidson. (1999). From the ashes of experience : reflections on madness, survival and growth. 23 indexed citations
20.
Pantelis, Christos, et al.. (1988). The South Camden Schizophrenia Survey: An experience of community-based research. Psychiatric Bulletin. 12(3). 98–101. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026