Peter Campbell

862 citations
48 papers · 483 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Campbell

42 papers receiving 443 citations

Peers

Peter Campbell
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Ophthalmology 83
  • General Health Professions 174
  • Public Administration 22
  • Clinical Psychology 95
  • Medical Terminology 1
Replace Usha Raman with:
Usha Raman India
Caroline Nicolas Australia
Anita Fitzgerald United States
Charlotte Cooper Ireland
Dorte Malig Rasmussen Denmark
Eleanor Flynn Australia
Anne Clancy Norway
Cecil L. Wittson United States
Sabine Meier Germany
Daniel C. Robinson United States
Peter Campbell relative to Usha Raman India Usha Raman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×22×
Usha Raman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Campbell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Campbell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Campbell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Campbell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Campbell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Campbell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Campbell. The network helps show where Peter Campbell may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Campbell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Campbell Line = papers co-authored together Peter Campbell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 48 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202051
2 200146
3 200646
4 200539
5 201534
6
User and Carer Involvement in Change Management in a Mental Health Context: Review of the Literature
200334
7 200830
8
From the ashes of experience : reflections on madness, survival and growth
199923
9 202119
10 198816
11 199216
12 197511
13 202010
14 200610
15 20238
16 20218
17 20208
18 20207
19 20236
20 20206

About Peter Campbell

Peter Campbell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Ophthalmology, Epidemiology and Philosophy, having authored 48 papers that have together received 483 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (6 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (4 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (3 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (83 citations), General Health Professions (174 citations), Public Administration (22 citations), Clinical Psychology (95 citations) and Medical Terminology (1 citation). Peter Campbell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Thurstine Basset, Jill Anderson, David F. Edgar, David Cameron, David P. Crabb, Pete R. Jones, Lee Jones, Bruce J. W. Evans, Ben Davidson and Phil Barker. Their work appears in journals such as Translational Vision Science & Technology, BMJ Open, Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Vision Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact