Peter Bracha

652 citations
23 papers · 468 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Bracha

20 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Peter Bracha
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Ophthalmology 262
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 171
  • Molecular Biology 164
  • Surgery 99
  • Genetics 43
Replace R Kanagawa with:
R Kanagawa Japan
Tianyu Zheng China
Joanne Finnigan United Kingdom
Reda Žemaitienė Lithuania
Sae Heun Rho South Korea
Bettina Thomas Germany
James Peña United States
Alastair Lockwood United Kingdom
Robert M. Schertzer United States
Julie Schaub United States
Peter Bracha relative to R Kanagawa Japan R Kanagawa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×32×
R Kanagawa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Bracha

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Bracha's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Bracha with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Bracha more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Bracha

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Bracha. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Bracha. The network helps show where Peter Bracha may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Bracha, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Bracha Line = papers co-authored together Peter Bracha links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018107
2 200992
3 201766
4 201754
5 201752
6 201727
7 198819
8 201810
9 20219
10 20216
11 20245
12
The renal carcinogenic effect of Merpafol in the Fischer 344 rat.
19894
13 20204
14 20243
15 20213
16 20232
17 20202
18
Prospective, randomized, subject-masked evaluation of intravitreal Sirolimus vs. anti-VEGF in chronic neovascular AMD with persistent retinal fluid: 1-year follow-up
20171
19 20211
20 20231

About Peter Bracha

Peter Bracha is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (13 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (6 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (4 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (2 papers), Ocular Oncology and Treatments (2 papers) and Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (262 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (171 citations), Molecular Biology (164 citations), Surgery (99 citations) and Genetics (43 citations). Peter Bracha has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and India. Frequent co-authors include Thomas A. Ciulla, Nicholas Moore, Núria Morral, John S. Pollack, David F. Williams, Steve S. Liu, Richard C. Johnston, Devon D. Goetz, John J. Callaghan and Rehan M. Hussain. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, Ophthalmology Retina, International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, Journal of American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus and Ophthalmic Epidemiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact