James Peña
Impact in
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Parasitology top 10%
- Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies
- Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics
Papers in
-
- Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies 3
- Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics 2
- Co-authors
- M. Rosario Hernandez (2 shared papers)Andrew W. Taylor (1 shared paper)Cynthia S. Ricard (1 shared paper)Olga A. Agapova (1 shared paper)B’Ann T. Gabelt (1 shared paper)Leonard A. Levin (1 shared paper)Mark J. Lucarelli (1 shared paper)Paul L. Kaufman (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Placenta (3 papers)British Journal of Ophthalmology (1 paper)Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (1 paper)Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition (1 paper)Metabolism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilAustralia
In The Last Decade
James Peña
11 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Ophthalmology 165
- Parasitology 60
- Pharmaceutical Science 25
- Immunology and Allergy 14
- Neurology 18
Countries citing papers authored by James Peña
This map shows the geographic impact of James Peña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Peña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Peña more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Peña
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Peña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Peña. The network helps show where James Peña may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Peña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 130 | |
| 2 | Increased elastin expression in astrocytes of the lamina cribrosa in response to elevated intraocular pressure. | 2001 | 93 |
| 3 | 1990 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 9 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 1 |
About James Peña
James Peña is a scholar working on Parasitology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Epidemiology, Immunology and Allergy and Pharmaceutical Science, having authored 11 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (3 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (2 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (2 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (1 paper), Mast cells and histamine (1 paper), Pancreatic function and diabetes (1 paper), Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research (1 paper) and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (165 citations), Parasitology (60 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (25 citations), Immunology and Allergy (14 citations) and Neurology (18 citations). James Peña has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. Rosario Hernandez, Andrew W. Taylor, Cynthia S. Ricard, Olga A. Agapova, B’Ann T. Gabelt, Leonard A. Levin, Mark J. Lucarelli, Paul L. Kaufman, James B. Field and José Roberto Mineo. Their work appears in journals such as Placenta, British Journal of Ophthalmology, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition and Metabolism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.