Peter Boor

784 total papers · 26.8k total citations
449 papers, 14.5k citations indexed

About

Peter Boor is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Nephrology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Peter Boor has authored 449 papers receiving a total of 14.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 133 papers in Molecular Biology, 84 papers in Nephrology and 68 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Peter Boor's work include Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (50 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (50 papers) and AI in cancer detection (23 papers). Peter Boor is often cited by papers focused on Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (50 papers), Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes (50 papers) and AI in cancer detection (23 papers). Peter Boor collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Slovakia. Peter Boor's co-authors include Jürgen Floege, Tammo Ostendorf, Sonja Djudjaj, Barbara M. Klinkhammer, Roman D. Bülow, S. D. Langford, Jürgen Floege, G.A.S. Ansari, Katarı́na Šebeková and Uta Kunter and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Circulation.

In The Last Decade

Peter Boor

431 papers receiving 14.3k citations

Hit Papers

Deep learning can predict... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2019 2010 2018 2019 2023 250 500 750

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Peter Boor 5.1k 2.9k 1.9k 1.8k 1.6k 449 14.5k
Takashi Wada 3.2k 0.6× 2.9k 1.0× 2.0k 1.0× 2.0k 1.1× 2.8k 1.7× 453 13.4k
Joseph P. Grande 4.2k 0.8× 3.8k 1.3× 2.9k 1.5× 2.8k 1.5× 1.5k 0.9× 282 14.9k
Raymond C. Harris 8.6k 1.7× 5.6k 1.9× 2.0k 1.1× 2.3k 1.3× 1.7k 1.1× 334 22.4k
Linda L. Demer 5.0k 1.0× 3.6k 1.2× 2.4k 1.3× 3.5k 1.9× 2.4k 1.5× 162 17.5k
Günter Wolf 3.5k 0.7× 3.7k 1.2× 1.1k 0.6× 1.3k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 359 12.3k
Thomas M. Coffman 6.4k 1.2× 2.2k 0.7× 1.5k 0.8× 2.1k 1.2× 2.4k 1.5× 253 20.2k
Hisashi Yamanaka 2.7k 0.5× 2.0k 0.7× 1.8k 0.9× 2.1k 1.2× 2.7k 1.7× 739 17.6k
Michiaki Kubo 5.1k 1.0× 1.2k 0.4× 2.0k 1.1× 2.1k 1.1× 2.0k 1.3× 383 18.2k
Javier Dı́ez 4.6k 0.9× 923 0.3× 1.5k 0.8× 3.2k 1.7× 1.5k 0.9× 407 19.7k
Loreto Gesualdo 4.9k 0.9× 5.8k 2.0× 2.4k 1.3× 2.8k 1.5× 2.8k 1.7× 529 17.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Boor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Boor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Boor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Boor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Boor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Boor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Boor. The network helps show where Peter Boor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Boor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Boor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Boor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Boor. Peter Boor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026