Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Martin J. Lipton
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin J. Lipton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin J. Lipton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin J. Lipton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin J. Lipton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin J. Lipton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin J. Lipton. The network helps show where Martin J. Lipton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin J. Lipton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin J. Lipton.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin J. Lipton based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Martin J. Lipton. Martin J. Lipton is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lipton, Martin J.. (2012). Twenty-Five Years After 'Takeover Bids in the Target's Boardroom': Old Battles, New Attacks and the Continuing War. SSRN Electronic Journal.3 indexed citations
3.
Lipton, Martin J., et al.. (2012). Election Contests in the Company's Proxy: An Idea Whose Time Has Not Come. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
4.
Oakes, Jeannie, et al.. (2008). Grassroots Organizing, Social Movements, and the Right to High-Quality Education. 339.9 indexed citations
5.
Lipton, Martin J., et al.. (2007). The Inconvenient Truth about Corporate Governance: Some Thoughts on Vice-Chancellor Strine's Essay. SSRN Electronic Journal. 33(1). 63.3 indexed citations
6.
Lipton, Martin J. & Charles E. Metz. (2000). Cost-effectiveness in radiology. European Radiology. 10(S3). S390–S392.2 indexed citations
7.
Lipton, Martin J.. (1997). Corporate Governance: Does It Make A Difference?. Fordham journal of corporate & financial law. 2(1). 41.1 indexed citations
8.
Guiton, Gretchen, et al.. (1995). Teaming: Creating Small Communities of Learners in the Middle Grades. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 96(5). 87–107.2 indexed citations
9.
Lorsch, Jay W. & Martin J. Lipton. (1993). On the leading edge: The lead director. Harvard business review. 71(1). 79–80.13 indexed citations
10.
Lipton, Martin J. & Martti Kormano. (1993). Computed tomography of liver tumors. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 53(S3). 192–196.1 indexed citations
Stanford, William L., Bruce H. Brundage, Robert McMillan, et al.. (1986). Sensitivity and specificity of assessing bypass graft patency with cine computed tomography results of a multicenter study. 124. 41.5 indexed citations
17.
Lipton, Martin J., Peter B. Dean, D. W. Farmer, Hans Ringertz, & C B Higgins. (1984). Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow by cine computed tomography. 107. 169.1 indexed citations
Goodwin, David A., Jerrold T. Bushberg, Paul W. Doherty, et al.. (1978). Indium-111-labeled autologous platelets for location of vascular thrombi in humans.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 19(6). 626–34.86 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.