Paul C. Stomper
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 0.5%
- Cancer Research top 1%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 1%
- Oncology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jack E. MeyerJames L. ConnollyStephen B. EdgeJanet S. WinstonMark A. ArredondoJay R. HarrisGary M. ProulxThelma C. Hurd
- Topics
- Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (33 papers)Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers)Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Paul C. Stomper
78 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.3k
- Cancer Research 1.2k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 918
- Oncology 860
- Surgery 600
Countries citing papers authored by Paul C. Stomper
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul C. Stomper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul C. Stomper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul C. Stomper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul C. Stomper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul C. Stomper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul C. Stomper. The network helps show where Paul C. Stomper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul C. Stomper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul C. Stomper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul C. Stomper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul C. Stomper. Paul C. Stomper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) of the tumor bed only for breast cancer : technique and outcome | 4 |
| 5 | Mammographic detection and staging of ductal carcinoma in situ: Mammographic-pathological correlation | 8 |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 103 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 208 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Sensitivity of Mammography on Patients with Paget's Disease of the Nipple | 8 |
| 13 | 184 | |
| 14 | 28 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 90 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Paul C. Stomper
Paul C. Stomper is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Cancer Research and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 78 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (33 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (23 papers) and Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (1.2k citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (1.3k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (918 citations). Paul C. Stomper has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Jack E. Meyer, James L. Connolly, Stephen B. Edge, Janet S. Winston, Mark A. Arredondo, Jay R. Harris, Gary M. Proulx, Thelma C. Hurd, Donald Klippenstein and Gary N. Schwartz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and Radiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.