Countries citing papers authored by Peter Almström
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Almström's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Almström with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Almström more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Almström. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Almström. The network helps show where Peter Almström may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Almström
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Almström.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Almström based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Almström. Peter Almström is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kristoffersson, Ida, et al.. (2018). Sampers4 : Skattning av regionala efterfrågemodeller. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Winroth, Mats, Peter Almström, & Carin Andersson. (2014). Indicators of sustainable production - A survey among Swedish manufacturing industry. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).3 indexed citations
10.
Almström, Peter. (2013). Performance and utilization factors for manual and semi-automated work. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).
11.
Winroth, Mats, Peter Almström, & Carin Andersson. (2012). Sustainable indicators at factory level – a framework for practical assessment. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).11 indexed citations
12.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2011). Profitability analysis based on production improvements in the electronics manufacturing industry. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).
13.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2011). The impact of land use planning on Cost-Benefit Analysis rankings.1 indexed citations
14.
Almström, Peter & Mats Winroth. (2010). Why is there a mismatch between operation times in the planning systems and the times in reality?. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).3 indexed citations
15.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2009). Productivity Potential Assessment of 30 Suppliers to the Automotive Industry. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).1 indexed citations
16.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2009). Manufacturing system analysis methods review. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).1 indexed citations
17.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2009). Analys av produktivitetspotentialen hos underleverantörer till den svenska fordonsindustrin. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).
18.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2008). Results and Conclusions from the Productivity Potential Assessment Studies. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).8 indexed citations
19.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2007). Productivity Potential Assessment of the Swedish Manufacturing Industry. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).9 indexed citations
20.
Almström, Peter, et al.. (2006). Att mäta produktivitetspotentialen - Rapport om PPA-metoden. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.