Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism
1998630 citationsPeta Darke, Graeme Shanks et al.Information Systems Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Peta Darke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peta Darke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peta Darke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peta Darke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peta Darke. The network helps show where Peta Darke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peta Darke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peta Darke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peta Darke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peta Darke. Peta Darke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Jagielska, Ilona, et al.. (2003). Business intelligence systems for decision support: concepts, processes and practice. 215–228.18 indexed citations
2.
Dawson, Linda & Peta Darke. (2002). The Adoption and Adaptation of Object Oriented Methodologies in Requirements Engineering Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 406–415.4 indexed citations
Shanks, Graeme, et al.. (1999). Stakeholder perceptions of data quality in a data warehouse environment. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 31(4). 110–116.10 indexed citations
Shanks, Graeme & Peta Darke. (1998). Understanding Data Quality and Data Warehousing: A Semiotic Approach.. 4(3). 292–309.5 indexed citations
9.
Darke, Peta, Graeme Shanks, & Marianne Broadbent. (1998). Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism. Information Systems Journal. 8(4). 273–289.630 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Shanks, Graeme & Peta Darke. (1998). A Framework for Understanding Data Quality. 46–51.5 indexed citations
11.
Shanks, Graeme & Peta Darke. (1998). Understanding data quality in a data warehouse: a semiotic approach. 292–309.1 indexed citations
12.
Shanks, Graeme & Peta Darke. (1997). Quality in Conceptual Modelling: Linking Theory and Practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 76.7 indexed citations
13.
Darke, Peta & Graeme Shanks. (1997). Managing User Viewpoints in Requirements Definition. 495–508.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.