Pere Pons

2.8k citations
65 papers · 1.7k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Pere Pons

61 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

Pere Pons
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Ecological Modeling 378
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 814
  • Ecology 953
  • Global and Planetary Change 726
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 401
Replace Regina C. C. Luizão with:
Regina C. C. Luizão Brazil
Lorna J. Cole United Kingdom
Marcin K. Dyderski Poland
Jennifer M. Fraterrigo United States
Karen Richardson United States
Thierry Tatoni France
Dawn R. Bazely Canada
Kåre Fog Denmark
Richard T. Reynolds United States
Martin Schütz Switzerland
Pere Pons relative to Regina C. C. Luizão Brazil Regina C. C. Luizão's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Regina C. C. Luizão · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pere Pons

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pere Pons's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pere Pons with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pere Pons more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pere Pons

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pere Pons. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pere Pons. The network helps show where Pere Pons may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pere Pons, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pere Pons Line = papers co-authored together Pere Pons links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004171
2 2009169
3 2020121
4 2005104
5 200596
6 200386
7 201061
8 200359
9 200856
10 200654
11 201540
12 202335
13 201835
14
OPEN-HABITAT BIRDS IN RECENTLY BURNED AREAS: THE ROLE OF THE FIRE EXTENT AND SPECIES' HABITAT BREADTH
200533
15 200829
16 201229
17 200327
18 201026
19 201225
20 201724

About Pere Pons

Pere Pons is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (34 papers), Fire effects on ecosystems (29 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Species Distribution and Climate Change (14 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (10 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (9 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (8 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (378 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (814 citations), Ecology (953 citations), Global and Planetary Change (726 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (401 citations). Pere Pons has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Miguel Clavero, Josep M. Bas, Crisanto Gómez, Núria Roura‐Pascual, Sergi Herrando, Bernard Lambert, Josep Rost, Daniel Sol, Roger Prodon and Alexander L. Wild. Their work appears in journals such as Biodiversity and Conservation, Bird Study, Biological Conservation, Biological Invasions and European Journal of Wildlife Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact