Pere Constans

532 citations
16 papers · 377 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Pere Constans

16 papers receiving 363 citations

Peers

Pere Constans
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 92
  • Spectroscopy 126
  • Organic Chemistry 182
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 91
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 151
Replace Candee C. Chambers with:
Candee C. Chambers United States
Yevgeniy Podolyan United States
Carol A. Venanzi United States
Rosana M. Lobayan Argentina
M. Devereux Switzerland
Andrzej B. Buda United States
Ljiljana Dos̆en‐Mićović Serbia
P. M. King United Kingdom
Yuri I. Binev Bulgaria
Martin Bohl Germany
Pere Constans relative to Candee C. Chambers United States Candee C. Chambers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Candee C. Chambers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pere Constans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pere Constans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pere Constans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pere Constans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pere Constans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pere Constans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pere Constans. The network helps show where Pere Constans may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pere Constans, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pere Constans Line = papers co-authored together Pere Constans links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 199578
2 199775
3 200054
4 200633
5 200625
6 199622
7 200019
8 199616
9 199315
10 20059
11 20038
12 19948
13 20045
14 19935
15 20094
16 20021

About Pere Constans

Pere Constans is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 377 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (8 papers), Molecular Spectroscopy and Structure (5 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers), Crystallography and molecular interactions (4 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (3 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (2 papers) and Catalytic Cross-Coupling Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (92 citations), Spectroscopy (126 citations), Organic Chemistry (182 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (91 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (151 citations). Pere Constans has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Ramon Carbó‐Dorca, Gustavo E. Scuseria, Philippe Y. Ayala, María Dolors Pujol, Jonathan D. Hirst, Juan J. Novoa, Myung‐Hwan Whangbo, Youssef Harrak, Jerzy Ciosłowski and Boris B. Stefanov. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computational Chemistry, European Journal of Organic Chemistry, Tetrahedron, Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design and International Journal of Quantum Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact