P. M. King

25 papers receiving 435 citations

Peers

P. M. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 76
  • Electrochemistry 43
  • Organic Chemistry 145
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 150
  • Filtration and Separation 10
Replace Michael Schlenkrich with:
Michael Schlenkrich Germany
R. Constanciel France
Sayantan Mondal India
R. L. Flurry United States
Caitlin C. Bannan United States
Hiroaki Utsumi Japan
Evan J. Arthur United States
Shalom Srebrenik Israel
Sara Del Galdo Italy
Alexandre Hocquet France
P. M. King relative to Michael Schlenkrich Germany Michael Schlenkrich's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Michael Schlenkrich · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P. M. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P. M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P. M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P. M. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P. M. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P. M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P. M. King. The network helps show where P. M. King may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside P. M. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with P. M. King Line = papers co-authored together P. M. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198872
2 199268
3 199454
4 198936
5 198931
6 198828
7 200026
8 199418
9 200317
10 198915
11 199715
12 200615
13 199012
14 20178
15 19908
16 19908
17 20008
18 20183
19 20012
20 20082

About P. M. King

P. M. King is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 452 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (6 papers), Free Radicals and Antioxidants (4 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (4 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (3 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (3 papers) and Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (76 citations), Electrochemistry (43 citations), Organic Chemistry (145 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (150 citations) and Filtration and Separation (10 citations). P. M. King has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Reynolds, W. Graham Richards, William G. Richards, Wilfred F. van Gunsteren, Salomon R. Billeter, Graham A. Worth, David T. Hickman, Jason Micklefield, Matthew A. Cooper and Andrew M. Waller. Their work appears in journals such as Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, English Journal of the English Association, Literature and Theology, Chemical Communications and Physical review. C.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact