Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Scenario-based performance analysis of routing protocols for mobile ad-hoc networks
1999594 citationsPer Johansson, Tony Larsson et al.profile →
Parenthood and the Gender Gap in Pay
2016295 citationsNikolay Angelov, Per Johansson et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Per Johansson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Per Johansson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Per Johansson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Per Johansson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Per Johansson. The network helps show where Per Johansson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Per Johansson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Per Johansson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Per Johansson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Per Johansson. Per Johansson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Johansson, Per, et al.. (2014). Pathways to Retirement and the Role of Financial Incentives in Sweden. Econstor (Econstor). 369–410.
6.
Angelov, Nikolay, Per Johansson, & Erica Lindahl. (2013). Is the Persistent Gender Gap in Income and Wages Due to Unequal Family Responsibilities. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Körner, Ulf, et al.. (2008). Urban mesh and ad hoc mesh networks. International Journal of Network Management. 18(2). 107–127.4 indexed citations
12.
Luna, Xavier de & Per Johansson. (2007). Comment on "Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data" by D. Zeng and D.Y. Lin. 69(4). 554–555.1 indexed citations
13.
Johansson, Per & Xavier de Luna. (2007). Comment on Maximum likelihood estimation in semiparametric regression models with censored data by Zeng and D.Y. Lin. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society). 554–555.1 indexed citations
14.
Johansson, Per. (2004). Comment on Philip de Jong and Maarten Lindeboom: Privatisation of sickness insurance: Evidence from the Netherlands. 11. 145–149.2 indexed citations
15.
Fredriksson, Peter & Per Johansson. (2003). Program Evaluation and Random Program Starts. Econstor (Econstor).2 indexed citations
16.
Broström, Göran, Per Johansson, & Mårten Palme. (2002). Economic incentives and gender differences in work absence behavior. Econstor (Econstor). 11. 33–63.24 indexed citations
Brännäs, Kurt & Per Johansson. (1994). Time series count data regression. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods. 23(10). 2907–2925.30 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.