Pei Se Wong
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Education
- Co-authors
- Syed Shahzad HasanTherése KairuzPui San SawSyed Imran AhmedChristopher FreemanLisa NissenVivienne MakYu Sui Chen
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- MalaysiaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Pei Se Wong
33 papers receiving 461 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- General Health Professions 185
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 168
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 144
- Economics and Econometrics 48
- Education 44
Countries citing papers authored by Pei Se Wong
This map shows the geographic impact of Pei Se Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pei Se Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pei Se Wong more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pei Se Wong
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pei Se Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pei Se Wong. The network helps show where Pei Se Wong may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pei Se Wong
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pei Se Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pei Se Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pei Se Wong. Pei Se Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Pei Se Wong
Pei Se Wong is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology and Family Practice, having authored 35 papers that have together received 478 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (13 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (168 citations), Family Practice (35 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (24 citations). Pei Se Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Malaysia, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Syed Shahzad Hasan, Therése Kairuz, Pui San Saw, Syed Imran Ahmed, Christopher Freeman, Lisa Nissen, Vivienne Mak, Yu Sui Chen, Muneer Gohar Babar and Normaliza Ab Malik. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.